| Model Number |
K272 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
04/16/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient with this pacemaker device underwent a revision.The patient was feeling the edge of the device.Moreover, the device was repositioned from subcutaneous to submuscular.This device remains in service.No additional adverse patient effects reported.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient with this pacemaker device underwent a revision.The patient was feeling the edge of the device.Moreover, the device was repositioned from subcutaneous to submuscular.This device remains in service.No additional adverse patient effects reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This product was manufactured prior to implementation of the udi regulation and as a result, the complete udi is not available.Applicable us product data has been included in this report.The returned device was thoroughly inspected and analyzed upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory.Visual examination of the device header and case noted no anomalies.Dimensional analysis of the header was completed.Each port measured as expected.The device was then exposed to simulated heart load conditions, and the pacing and sensing functions were tested.Impedance testing was completed and all measurements were within normal limits.The device was successfully interrogated and completed a memory dump.Visual inspection found no irregularities that would have been present when the customer received utilized the device, and the header was firmly attached.The longevity calculation for this device passed or was not applicable, therefore no problem was detected.Device history record - a review of the device history record (dhr) was performed.The review of the dhr identified that there were no process related non-conformances, scrap, or rework performed during the production that could explain the event.The reviews ensure each device meets specification prior to release for use.There is no indication the device manufacturing process contributed to the reported complaint.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|