• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. MNITAC 2.0 TI W/NDL 22-0 ULTRABRAID; STAPLE, FIXATION, BONE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. MNITAC 2.0 TI W/NDL 22-0 ULTRABRAID; STAPLE, FIXATION, BONE Back to Search Results
Model Number 72202019
Medical Device Problem Code Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 07/09/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference: (b)(6).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, during a wrist tfcc repair scope using the minitac, the first ultrabraid anchor was dislodged from the bone and the second suture anchor did not deploy.No significant delay and the procedure was completed by putting into a 19g needle, thereafter, the surgeon pierce the tendon using the needle and it passed the suture.No patient injury or other complications were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6: part of the reported device, used in treatment, was received for evaluation.There was no relationship found between the returned device and the reported incident.A complaint history review found no similar reported events.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A visual inspection found the anchor separated is from the inserter with a piece of cut suture through the anchor.The remaining suture and needles were not returned.A functional evaluation revealed that the nose cone rotated properly.The complaint was not confirmed and the root cause could not be determined.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include inadequate bone quality, improper preparation of the insertion site, or off-axis insertion of the device.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future reoccurrence of the reported event.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MNITAC 2.0 TI W/NDL 22-0 ULTRABRAID
Common Device Name
STAPLE, FIXATION, BONE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
130 forbes blvd.
mansfield MA 02048
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
130 forbes blvd.
mansfield MA 02048
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key12249277
Report Number1219602-2021-01645
Device Sequence Number8116906
Product Code JDR
UDI-Device Identifier03596010619013
UDI-Public03596010619013
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountrySN
PMA/510(K) Number
K000797
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/02/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/20/2025
Device Model Number72202019
Device Catalogue Number72202019
Device Lot Number2053769
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/23/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/09/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/30/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/29/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/02/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/20/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-