• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 PONSKY PEG KIT, 20F; FEEDING TUBE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 PONSKY PEG KIT, 20F; FEEDING TUBE Back to Search Results
Model Number 006035
Medical Device Problem Codes Loss of or Failure to Bond (1068); Fracture (1260); Material Separation (1562); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 07/05/2021
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
As the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the post feeding device implant, the internal bumper allegedly detached.It was further reported that the internal bumper was removed using an endoscope.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: one ponsky pull peg with retention dome detached, one star bolster, and one disengaged clamp was returned for evaluation.Gross visual and microscopic visual evaluation were performed for the returned device.The investigation is confirmed for the reported fracture and identified material separation issue, as the dome was received fractured from the feeding tube.The fracture appeared to be associated with the complete circumferential break noted at the distal end of the feeding tube.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) found that the product labeling was inadequate.H10: b5, g3 h11: h6 (device, result, conclusion) h11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the approximately seven months post feeding device implant, the internal bumper allegedly detached.It was further reported that the internal bumper was removed using an endoscope.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: one ponsky pull peg with retention dome detached, one star bolster, and one disengaged clamp were returned for evaluation.Gross visual and microscopic visual evaluation were performed for the returned device.The investigation is confirmed for the reported material separation and identified loss of or failure to bond issues, as the dome was received separated from the feeding tube.Further, the investigation is also confirmed for the identified fracture issue as a fracture was noted at the proximal end of the dome migrating toward the distal end of the dome.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) found that the product labeling was inadequate.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the approximately seven months post feeding device implant, the internal bumper allegedly detached.It was further reported that the internal bumper was removed using an endoscope.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PONSKY PEG KIT, 20F
Common Device Name
FEEDING TUBE
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED -3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
judy ludwig
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key12253338
Report Number3006260740-2021-03032
Device Sequence Number11934529
Product Code KNT
UDI-Device Identifier00801741081187
UDI-Public(01)00801741081187
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K915841
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2021
Device Explanted Year2021
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 12/31/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number006035
Device Catalogue Number006035
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/21/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/05/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/24/2021
01/05/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/30/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/26/2021
01/10/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-