• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number SONATA
Medical Device Problem Codes Impedance Problem (2950); Output Problem (3005)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Failure of Implant (1924)
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device has not been explanted.If it should be explanted, it is to be returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.When available, a device failure analysis will be submitted as a follow up report.
 
Event or Problem Description
The user was seen on (b)(6) 2021 for the annual fitting.In situ testing done during this appointment showed all affected channels.At the appointment with the med-el expert on (b)(6) 2021, the audio processor was checked and found to be functioning and previous measurements were confirmed.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: based on the received information, a damage to the active electrode due to excessive mechanical stress seems very likely.However to determine an exact root cause device investigation would be necessary.No information on possible further steps has been received yet.
 
Event or Problem Description
The user was seen on (b)(6) 2021 for his annual fitting.In situ testing done during this appointment showed all channels affected with high impedance or short circuits.At the appointment with the med-el expert on (b)(6) 2021, the audio processor was checked and found to be functioning and the previous measurements were confirmed.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: overload fractures in the active electrode which are consistent with an external mechanical impact were determined to be the root cause of device failure.The problems given in the recipient report appear to match the damage found.This is a final report.
 
Event or Problem Description
The user was seen on (b)(6) 2021 for his annual fitting.In situ testing done during this appointment showed all channels affected with high impedance or short circuits.The user has been re-implanted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM
Common Device Name
COCHLEAR IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH
innsbruck
AU 
Manufacturer Contact
laura simonotti
fuerstenweg 77a
innsbruck 6020
AU   6020
57788
MDR Report Key12257703
Report Number9710014-2021-00568
Device Sequence Number11680303
Product Code MCM
UDI-Device Identifier09008737049188
UDI-Public(01)09008737049188
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryFR
PMA/510(K) Number
P000025
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2019
Device Explanted Year2022
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/10/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date09/24/2021
Device Model NumberSONATA
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/29/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/29/2021
07/29/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/02/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/08/2021
02/10/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/24/2018
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age11 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-