|
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ALTRUA 60; IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT)
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
S601 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Battery Problem (2885)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
06/09/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that this pacemaker previously showed one year remaining longevity.During the recent check, the device showed two and a half years remaining longevity.Boston scientific technical services (ts) suggested to do a save to disk analysis.As of this time, the device remains in service.No adverse patient effects reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This product has not been returned to boston scientific, and as a result, laboratory analysis could not be conducted.The associated investigation determined that battery status indicators were different than expected based on information provided to boston scientific.Factors influencing the estimated longevity remaining calculation include pacing rate, amplitude, pulse-width and lead impedance.Any even slight changes in these factors will impact the battery consumption calculation and therefore the remaining longevity estimate.Please refer to the description for more information regarding the specific circumstances of this event.Please note this pacemaker's battery was designed to estimate remaining longevity and trigger corresponding device replacement indicators based on the pacing capacitor charge time, which progressively increases as the battery depletes.These pacemakers were not designed with an ability to calculate remaining longevity for every possible current drain, which may cause replacement indicators to trigger earlier than what was previously estimated; however, it does not negatively impact the use, operation, safety, or performance of the device.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that this pacemaker previously showed one year remaining longevity.During the recent check, the device showed two and a half years remaining longevity.Boston scientific technical services (ts) suggested to do a save to disk analysis.As of this time, the device remains in service.No adverse patient effects reported.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that this pacemaker previously showed one year remaining longevity.During the recent check, the device showed two and a half years remaining longevity.Boston scientific technical services (ts) suggested to do a save to disk analysis.Additional information received indicating that this device was explanted due to normal battery depletion (nbd) and a new device was placed.No adverse patient effects reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This product has not been returned to boston scientific, and as a result, laboratory analysis could not be conducted.The associated investigation determined that battery status indicators were different than expected based on information provided to boston scientific.Factors influencing the estimated longevity remaining calculation include pacing rate, amplitude, pulse-width and lead impedance.Any even slight changes in these factors will impact the battery consumption calculation and therefore the remaining longevity estimate.Please refer to the description for more information regarding the specific circumstances of this event.Please note this pacemaker's battery was designed to estimate remaining longevity and trigger corresponding device replacement indicators based on the pacing capacitor charge time, which progressively increases as the battery depletes.These pacemakers were not designed with an ability to calculate remaining longevity for every possible current drain, which may cause replacement indicators to trigger earlier than what was previously estimated; however, it does not negatively impact the use, operation, safety, or performance of the device.Upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory, detailed mechanical and electrical testing was performed on the device.The device battery status was eol.The device functioned normally throughout testing.Laboratory analysis determined that this device experienced normal battery depletion; however, it was reported from the field that the estimated longevity remaining value appeared to decrease more quickly than expected between routine follow-ups.Factors influencing the estimated longevity remaining calculation include pacing rate, amplitude, pulse-width and lead impedance.Any (even slight) changes in these factors will impact the battery consumption calculation and therefore the remaining longevity estimate.Please note that, despite the drop in estimated longevity remaining, the actual battery condition did not change significantly between follow-ups.In summary, it was determined that this device experienced normal battery depletion but declared eol earlier than previously estimated.Of note, the estimated remaining battery longevity of this pacemaker was designed to be calculated (and trigger corresponding device replacement indicators) based on the pacing capacitor charge time, which progressively increases as the battery depletes.These pacemakers were not designed with an ability to calculate remaining longevity for every possible current drain, which may cause replacement indicators to trigger earlier than what was previously estimated; however, it does not negatively impact the use, operation, safety, or performance of the device.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|