|
It was reported that a safe-t-j fixed core wire guide unraveled and "snapped".The device was placed in a (b)(6) year-old female patient for the purpose of inserting a paracentesis pigtail drainage catheter.During the procedure, the user experienced difficulty when attempting to remove the wire guide from the 12fr drainage catheter that was in the patient.The user noted the wire guide was uncoiling while in the catheter.Once the wire guide was removed from the patient, the user confirmed the wire guide was "snapped, uncoiled, elongated, and stretched to the limit".As reported, the patient did not experience any adverse effects or require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.
|
|
Investigation ¿ evaluation: on 29jul2021, cook australia received a complaint from a representative at the dr.Jones & partner radiology - port augusta hospital, located in the city of port augusta, sa, au.During the removal of the safe-t-j fixed core wire guide (rpn: tscf-35-80-3, lot number: 13813314) from the 12fr.Catheter that was inserted into the patient, the wire would not easily come out.While in the patient through the catheter, the wire appeared to have 'snapped' and uncoiled, appearing as it had been 'stretched'.Once the wire guide was removed, it was discovered the wire was broken and elongated.Reviews of documentation including the complaint history, device history record, quality control, manufacturing instructions, specifications, and instructions for use (ifu), as well as a visual inspection of the returned device, were conducted during the investigation.One used and damaged wire guide measuring 129 cm was received.The safety wire and mandril wire were exposed and protruding from the elongated coils.The distal weld connection was confirmed to be intact.Cook has concluded that the device was manufactured to specification.Additionally, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the dhrs for the reported complaint device lot (13813314) discovered one possible relevant recorded non-conformance, having a quantity of one.This device was scrapped prior to further processing.To date, a further search of our database records revealed this complaint to be the only reported complaint associated with the complaint lot number.Based on the available information, cook has concluded that there is no evidence suggesting nonconforming product exists either in house or in field.Cook also reviewed product labeling.The complaint device (tscf-35-80-3) is not supplied with an instructions for use (ifu).Based on the available information, inspection of the returned device, and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded that component failure unrelated to manufacturing or design deficiencies contributed to this incident.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the risk assessment no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|