• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 CATHERA

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 CATHERA Back to Search Results
Model Number FG19120-1030-1S
Device Problems Break (1069); Difficult to Remove (1528); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/02/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received a report that the phenom plus catheter experienced resistance in the distal part of the guide catheter and separated.The patient was undergoing onyx embolization treatment in the middle meningeal artery.The vessel tortuosity was moderate.The access vessel was the the femoral artery, which was 5mm in diameter.It was reported that the phenom plus catheter would not travel through the benchmark guide catheter, and the distal end of the phenom catheter ripped and became detached.The guide catheter appeared very flattened, which was thought to be the reason for the detachment.It was noted that the there was friction/difficulty during injection, and force had been applied during delivery/removal.The catheter tip was entrapped/stuck, and there was no vasospasm.No further medical or surgical intervention was required. the patient did not experience any injury or complications.The devices were prepared and flushed according to the instructions for use (ifu).Ancillary devices include a penumbra benchmark.071 guide catheter and an apollo microcatheter.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received on 2021-08-09.It was reported that the onyx had not been injected when the catheter separated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H3.Product analysis: the phenom plus catheter, apollo microcatheter and non-medtronic penumbra benchmark.071 guide catheter were returned for analysis within shipping box; and within a plastic bag.Upon visual inspection, no damages or irregularities were found with the phenom plus hub.The phenom plus catheter body was found to be kinked at ~109.0cm from catheter hub.The phenom plus distal marker/tip appeared to be broken and separated.In addition, the separated distal marker/tip was not returned; therefore, any contributing factors (such as damage) could not be assessed.No damages were found with the apollo hub.No bends or kinks were found with the apollo catheter body.The apollo detachable tip was found intact.No damages were found with the apollo distal marker/tip.No damages were found with non-medtronic penumbra benchmark.071 guide catheter hub and body.The non-medtronic penumbra benchmark.071 guide catheter distal tip appeared to be flattened.No other anomalies were observed.The total and usable lengths of phenom catheter was not within specifications.The phenom plus catheter was flushed, water exited from distal tip.The phenom plus catheter was tested with an in-house mandrel.The mandrel successfully passed through the catheter hub and tip with no issues.The apollo total and usable lengths were measured to be within specification and the distal floppy segment length was measured to be within specification.Based on the device analysis and reported information, the customer¿s report of ¿resistance in guide catheter¿ could not be confirmed as an in-house mandrel was used for resistance testing with no issues and no resistance felt.However, the catheter separation/break was confirmed as the distal tip/marker band was found to be separated and the root cause could not be determined.There was no non-conformance to specifications identified that led to the resistance issue.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CATHERA
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
6122713209
MDR Report Key12294521
MDR Text Key267438913
Report Number2029214-2021-00990
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQY
UDI-Device Identifier00763000399733
UDI-Public00763000399733
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K151638
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/15/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/09/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/07/2024
Device Model NumberFG19120-1030-1S
Device Catalogue NumberFG19120-1030-1S
Device Lot Number221459990
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/05/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/30/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/07/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexFemale
-
-