• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SMART COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SMART COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Model Number 400SMTHXSFT1H02
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Perforation of Vessels (2135)
Event Date 07/15/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The product was not returned for evaluation.From the information provided, there is no indication that there was any device malfunction, nonconformance, or misuse that contributed to the reported event.Potential adverse events in the labeling with the penumbra smart coil system include, but are not limited to dissection, or perforation, aneurysm rupture, intracranial hemorrhage, including death.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This report is associated with mfr report number: 3005168196-2021-01774.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2021, the patient underwent a coil embolization procedure to treat a ruptured aneurysm in the left internal carotid artery (ica) and posterior communicating (pcom) artery using penumbra smart coils (smart coil), a non-penumbra microcatheter and a guidewire.During the procedure, the physician implanted eight smart coils in the target location using the microcatheter.While attempting to advance the next smart coil, the physician was unable to advance the smart coil at all past its initial position within its introducer sheath.It was reported that multiple attempts were made to advance the smart coil; however, they were unsuccessful.Therefore, the smart coil was removed.Next, the physician implanted five smart coils in the target location using the microcatheter.After advancing the next smart coil into the target location, the physician attempted to reposition the microcatheter to find a good position for the smart coil.While repositioning the microcatheter, the smart coil and microcatheter extended beyond the aneurysm wall which caused a perforation.The physician then repositioned the microcatheter and smart coil and detached the smart coil in the target location.Additional smart coils were then implanted in the target location to bridge the point of perforation and close the portion of the aneurysm dome.Subsequently, it was noticed that there was a brief and small amount of contrast extravasation which quickly sealed.It was reported there was no change in the patient¿s vitals.The event was considered resolved the same day (b)(6) 2021.The aneurysm perforation was reported to be a serious adverse event with a definite relationship to the smart coil and index procedure.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SMART COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key12297651
MDR Text Key265782982
Report Number3005168196-2021-01775
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548015651
UDI-Public00814548015651
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K160832
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/01/2005,08/09/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number400SMTHXSFT1H02
Device Catalogue Number400SMTHXSFT1H02
Device Lot NumberF98554
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/15/2021
Initial Date FDA Received08/09/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/26/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age87 YR
-
-