This report is being submitted as follow up no.2 to provide the device return date in section d9, update section h3, and to provide the completed investigation results.The actual sample was received for evaluation.Visual inspection revealed no anomaly including a breakage that could lead to air on oxygenator.After rinsing and drying the actual sample, it was installed into a circuit consisting of tubes, and the saline solution was circulated by a roller pump.No leakage was found that could lead to residual air or mixed air.Bovine blood (37°c, hb12g/dl) was circulated in the actual sample under the conditions of back pressure 200mmhg, blood flow rate 0.5l/min, 1.0l/min, 1.5l/min, and in order to confirm the air bubble removal performance, 10 ml of air was flowed from the oxygenator inlet port side over 30 seconds.No air outflow was observed from the oxygenator through the filter (after connecting the arterial filter to the blood outlet port side and letting air flow in from the blood inlet port side, the presence or absence of air outflow to the oxygenator and the arterial filter is confirmed).Ifu states: ensure that the de-airing process is complete prior to initiating bypass.During recirculation, do not use pulsatile flow and do not stop the blood pump suddenly as these actions may cause gaseous emboli to enter the blood phase from the gas phase due to inertia force.Do not obstruct gas outlet port.Avoid build up of excess pressure in the gas phase to prevent gaseous emboli entering the blood phase.Pressure in the blood phase should always be higher than that in the gas phase to prevent gaseous emboli entering the blood phase.The gas flow rate should not exceed 5l/min.Excessive gas flow rate will bring about pressure increase in the gas phase, allowing gaseous emboli to enter the blood phase.To prevent gaseous emboli from entering the blood phase, make sure that the arterial pump flow rate always exceeds the flow rate of the cardioplegia line.The blood flow rate of the cardioplegia line should not exceed 0.5l/min.Based on the provided information and investigation results, there is no definitive evidence that this event was related to a device defect or malfunction.The investigation results verified the returned sample was of normal product.It was likely that air flowed into the oxygenator for some reason, or air remained during priming.The exact cause of the reported event cannot be definitively determined based on the available information.
|