• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL UNKNOWN T2 ALPHA FEMUR NAIL, SIZE 9X300; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL UNKNOWN T2 ALPHA FEMUR NAIL, SIZE 9X300; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK_KIE
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); Non-union Bone Fracture (2369)
Event Date 07/14/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device will not be returned at this time.If additional information becomes available, it will be provided in a supplemental report.Device retained by hospital.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the nail was implanted in (b)(6) 2021 to repair a femur fracture that never healed properly (non-union).The nail was inserted with an antibiotic coating.The patient returned for a scheduled revision.The planned revision was for the nail to be removed and a knee joint fused with arthrodesis nail.Once in the or, it was discovered the nail was broken.The surgeon changed his plan wen the broken nail was noticed.The broken nail was removed; a larger t2 alpha nail and titanium plate were put in.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
D2b and d2a, d3, d4 corrected.Please note: fda registration number should be (b)(6) the reported event could not be confirmed, since the device was not returned for evaluation and no other evidence was provided.Nail breakage in general has been experienced but does not present an unanticipated event in itself.Depending on load application, also, depending on the patient¿s post implant behaviour and depending on suitable anatomical reduction, depending on the kind of bone breakage, depending on the course of bone healing and other factors ¿ e.G.Increased postoperative activities ¿ a nail breakage can rather be classified as anticipated; specifically if one or more contributing issues concurrence with each other.Initially ¿¿the nail was put in 2 months ago to fix a femur fracture that never healed properly.A non-union¿¿ and thus, it could not be excluded that the case is rather clinical conditions related.According to event description ¿¿the doctor's initial plan for the knee fusion was changed once we noticed that the nail was broken.¿¿ and finally, the broken nail was revised by a ¿larger t-2 alpha nail and titanium plate¿ which could be considered as a hint to insufficient bone healing.One requirement for successful nail treatment is a timely bone healing in order to relieve the nail over the progressing time of implantation.Potential adverse effects are clearly pointed out in the labelling.Nevertheless, more detailed information about the complaint event as well as the affected device must be available in order to determine the exact root cause of the complaint event.A review of the device history was not possible because the lot number was not communicated.No corrective actions are required at this time.An indication of material, manufacturing or design related problems could not be checked as the device was not made available for a physical evaluation.In case substantive information will become available in future that suggests otherwise we reserve the right to reopen the case.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the nail was implanted in (b)(6) 2021 to repair a femur fracture that never healed properly (non-union).The nail was inserted with an antibiotic coating.The patient returned for a scheduled revision.The planned revision was for the nail to be removed and a knee joint fused with arthrodesis nail.Once in the or, it was discovered the nail was broken.The surgeon changed his plan when the broken nail was noticed.The broken nail was removed; a larger t2 alpha nail and titanium plate were put in.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN T2 ALPHA FEMUR NAIL, SIZE 9X300
Type of Device
ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL
prof. kuentscher-strasse 1-5
postfach
schoenkirchen/kiel D-242 32
GM  D-24232
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL
prof. kuentscher-strasse 1-5
postfach
schoenkirchen/kiel D-242 32
GM   D-24232
Manufacturer Contact
sharon rivas
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key12301985
MDR Text Key265861987
Report Number0008031020-2021-00347
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HSB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/08/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/10/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_KIE
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/11/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age75 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient RaceWhite
-
-