• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CORDIS CORPORATION TRAPEASE PVCF FEM/JUG 55CM CSI; FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CORDIS CORPORATION TRAPEASE PVCF FEM/JUG 55CM CSI; FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 466P306AU
Device Problems Fracture (1260); Unintended Movement (3026)
Patient Problems Internal Organ Perforation (1987); Pain (1994); Perforation of Vessels (2135); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
Event Date 03/24/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that a patient underwent placement of a trapease vena cava filter.The information provided indicated that the filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused filter tilting.The indication for the filter implant has not been provided and there is currently no additional information available for review.The product was not returned for analysis and the sterile lot number has not been provided; therefore, no device analysis nor device history record review could be performed.The trapease vena cava filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pulmonary embolism where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pulmonary embolism where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.Ivc filter tilt has been associated with practitioner technique and/or vessel anatomy, specifically asymmetry and tortuosity.Without imaging available for review the event could not be confirmed nor a cause attributed.Given the limited information available for review at this time, there is nothing to suggest that the reported events are related to the design and manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.
 
Event Description
As reported in the legal brief, a patient underwent placement of a trapease vena cava filter.The filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury and damage to the patient, including, but not limited to filter tilting.As a direct and proximate result, the patient suffered life-threatening injuries and damages and required extensive medical care and treatment.As a further proximate result, the patient has suffered and will suffer significant medical expenses, pain, suffering and other damages.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that a patient underwent placement of a trapease vena cava filter.The information provided indicated that the filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused filter tilting.The patient reported becoming aware of filter struts outside the inferior vena cava (ivc), perforation of struts into organs, tilting and fractured filter struts retained in the ivc, approximately fourteen years and two months post implant.The patient also reported having a number of illnesses, heart problems, type ii diabetes, asthma, and depression.The patient also reported anxiety related to the filter.According to the procedure case note the patient had a history of hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, obesity, deep vein thrombosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.The filter was placed via the left femoral vein without complications.The product was not returned for analysis and the sterile lot number has not been provided; therefore, no device analysis nor device history record review could be performed.The trapease vena cava filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pe where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pe where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.The instructions for use (ifu) states filter fracture is a potential complication of vena cava filters.Anatomic locations that create concentrated stress points from filter deformation (for example, deployment at apex of scoliosis, overlapping of either of the renal ostia, or placement adjacent to a vertebral osteophyte) may contribute to fracture of a particular filter strut.Ivc filter tilt has been associated operator technique and/or vessel anatomy, specifically asymmetry and tortuosity.A review of the ifu notes vessel damage such as intimal tears and perforation as procedural and long-term complications related to ivc filters.Without procedural films or post implant images for review the reported event(s) could not be confirmed or further clarified.Anxiety does not represent a device malfunction and may be related to underlying patient specific issues.Given the limited information available for review at this time, there is nothing to suggest that the reported events are related to the design and manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.
 
Event Description
Per the implant records, the patient was reported to have a preoperative diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (dvt), hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (copd).Peripheral vascular disease and obesity were noted as risk factors.The patient was prepped and draped in sterile fashion and the left femoral vein was accessed by percutaneous stick, followed by insertion of a sheath into the left femoral vein and trapease filter placement without reported complications.According to the information received in the patient profile form (ppf), the patient reports perforation of filter struts outside the inferior vena cava (ivc), perforation of struts into organs, tilting and fractured filter struts retained in the ivc, becoming aware of these events approximately fourteen years and two months after the filter implantation.The patient further asserts to have suffered from several illnesses such as heart problems, type 2 diabetes, asthma, depression, problems with other surgeries and experienced anxiety related to the filter.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRAPEASE PVCF FEM/JUG 55CM CSI
Type of Device
FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CORDIS CORPORATION
14201 nw 60th avenue
miami lakes FL 33014 2802
Manufacturer (Section G)
CORDIS CORPORATION
14201 nw 60th ave
miami lakes FL 33014 2802
Manufacturer Contact
karla castro
14201 nw 60th ave
miami lakes, FL 33014-2802
7863138372
MDR Report Key12326423
MDR Text Key266841594
Report Number1016427-2021-05291
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K020316
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/13/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/16/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number466P306AU
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/06/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
UNK 6F SHEATH; UNK LEMAITRE STENT GUIDE; UNK MEDICAL MARKETING MICROPUNCTURE SET; UNK MERIT MEDICAL 0.335 BENTSON 150CM
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
Patient Age68 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-