• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 BROVIAC CV CATHETER, SINGLE-LUMEN, 4.2F; CHRONIC CATHETERS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 BROVIAC CV CATHETER, SINGLE-LUMEN, 4.2F; CHRONIC CATHETERS Back to Search Results
Model Number 0600060
Medical Device Problem Codes Fracture (1260); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
Date of Event 07/21/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
As the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that post port device placement, redness was allegedly found along the catheter implanted area.The current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.Furthermore, the clinical conditions alleged in the complaint cannot be confirmed.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that one day post port device placement, redness was allegedly found along the catheter implanted area.The current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that one day post port device placement, redness was allegedly found along the catheter implanted area.The current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: one broviac s/l catheter was returned for evaluation.Gross, microscopic visual and functional testing were performed.The investigation is confirmed for the identified catheter split issue as a longitudinal split was noted approximately 4.7cm from the distal end of the outer catheter sleeve.Upon infusion, leaking was noted from the longitudinal split.Furthermore, the clinical conditions allege in the complaint cannot be confirmed.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that one day post port device placement, redness was allegedly found along the catheter implanted area.The current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: one broviac s/l catheter was returned for evaluation.Gross, microscopic visual and functional testing were performed.The investigation is confirmed for the identified catheter split issue as a longitudinal split was noted approximately 4.7cm from the distal end of the outer catheter sleeve.Upon infusion, leaking was noted from the longitudinal split.Furthermore, the clinical conditions alleged in the complaint cannot be confirmed.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: one broviac s/l catheter was returned for evaluation.Gross, microscopic visual and functional testing were performed.The investigation is confirmed for the identified catheter split issue as a longitudinal split was noted approximately 4.7cm from the distal end of the strengthening catheter sleeve.Upon infusion, leaking was noted from the longitudinal split.Furthermore, the clinical conditions alleged in the complaint cannot be confirmed.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that one day post port device placement, redness was allegedly found along the catheter implanted area.The current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BROVIAC CV CATHETER, SINGLE-LUMEN, 4.2F
Common Device Name
CHRONIC CATHETERS
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED -3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
judy ludwig
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key12329700
Report Number3006260740-2021-03344
Device Sequence Number3001804
Product Code LJS
UDI-Device Identifier00801741051692
UDI-Public(01)00801741051692
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K830256
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2021
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/21/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number0600060
Device Catalogue Number0600060
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/15/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/21/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/24/2021
10/30/2021
03/15/2022
04/21/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/17/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/26/2021
11/02/2021
03/17/2022
04/25/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-