|
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 TITANIUM LOW-PROFILE IMPLANTABLE PORT, BROVIAC SINGLE-LUMEN, 6.6F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
0606100 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Disconnection (1171); Material Separation (1562); Migration (4003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Swelling/ Edema (4577)
|
| Date of Event |
06/16/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history record is currently being performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.(expiry date: 12/2024).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that post device implant and upon x-ray examination of the chest, it was noted that the catheter of the device had allegedly migrated into the cardiac due to separation between the chamber and the catheter.It was further reported that edema was witnessed on the patient.The device was reported to be removed and replaced.The current status of the patient is unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported material separation and migration issues, as no objective evidence was provided for review.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 12/2024).H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that post device implant and upon x-ray examination of the chest, it was noted that the catheter of the device had allegedly migrated into the cardiac due to separation between the chamber and the catheter.It was further reported that edema was witnessed on the patient.The device was reported to be removed and replaced.The current status of the patient is unknown.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|