MAKO SURGICAL CORP. FEMORAL/TIBIAL CHECKPOINT KIT -(STERILE); STEREOTAXIC DEVICE, ROBOTICS
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 111645 |
Device Problems
Fracture (1260); Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problems
Unspecified Infection (1930); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 03/29/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As part of the normal complaint follow-up, an evaluation of the event has been initiated by mako surgical.A supplemental report will be submitted when additional information becomes available.
|
|
Event Description
|
Checkpoints left in patient.Patient needed secondary surgery to remove checkpoints, and perform liner exchange.
|
|
Event Description
|
Checkpoints left in patient.Patient needed secondary surgery to remove checkpoints, and perform liner exchange.Update: the surgeon informed me a few days after the primary surgery that we had left hardware in but if no intervention was necessary, we would leave it.The patient's knee became swollen and infected, so we went back in for a hardware removal and liner exchange.At that point i considered the case to be resolved.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The following device was also listed in this report: device: femoral/tibial checkpoint kit -(sterile); catalogue: 111645 ; lot#: unknown it cannot be determined which, if any of these devices may have caused or contributed to the patient's experience.Reported event: checkpoints left in patient.Patient needed secondary surgery to remove checkpoints, and perform liner exchange.Case type / application: tka.Update: the surgeon informed me a few days after the primary surgery that we had left hardware in but if no intervention was necessary, we would leave it.The patient's knee became swollen and infected, so we went back in for a hardware removal and liner exchange.At that point i considered the case to be resolved.Product history review: product history review was not conducted as lot number was not provided.Complaint history review: complaint history review was not conducted as lot number was not provided.Conclusions: the alleged failure is due to the user error, since user has not followed the surgical protocol.There is no issue with the device.If device and/or additional information become available, this investigation will be reopened.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|