COOK INC GUNTHER TULIP JUGULAR VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number IGTCFS-80-JUG |
Device Problems
Structural Problem (2506); Device Tipped Over (2589); Unintended Movement (3026); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
|
Patient Problems
Internal Organ Perforation (1987); Perforation of Vessels (2135); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Initial reporter occupation: non-healthcare professional investigation: it has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information and/or no device failure provided to date.Catalog number and lot number are unknown, however, the alleged tulip is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.
|
|
Event Description
|
It is alleged that the patient received a gunther tulip inferior vena cava (ivc) filter on (b)(6) 2005, and the patient was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested, but not yet provided.
|
|
Event Description
|
Patient allegedly received an implant on (b)(6) 2005 via the right internal jugular vein due to pre-bariatric surgery.The patient alleges tilt, vena cava perforation, organ perforation.(b)(6) 2019, per a report from computed tomography; ¿mild cranial migration of ivc filter is seen with its tip lying just above the right renal vein.Its tip shows an abnormal tilt with the apex of the filter touching the anterior ivc wall.Perforation of four struts is seen-anteriorly the tip of a strut abuts outer wall of third part of duodenum, about 1mm from ivc wall; laterally the tip of a strut abuts outer wall of second part of duodenum, about 1.2mm from ivc wall posteriorly, the tip of a strut lies in retrocaval fat, about 1.2mm from ivc wall and medially the tip of a strut lies in aortocaval fat, about 1mm from ivc wall.No obvious invasion into surrounding viscera is seen.2.No evident strut fracture of ivc stenosis seen.¿.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation: the following allegations have been investigated: organ/vena cava (vc) perforation, tilt.Investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.Filter interacts with ivc wall, e.G.Penetration/perforation/embedment.This may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include improper deployment; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in-situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: trauma to adjacent structures, vascular trauma, vena cava perforation, vena cava penetration.Filter or filter fragment migration and (or) embolization (e.G., movement to the heart or lungs) has been reported.Filter or filter fragment movement has occurred in both the cranial and caudal direction and may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include filter placement in ivcs with diameters smaller or larger than those specified in these instructions for use; improper deployment; deployment into thrombus; dislodgement due to large thrombus burdens; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: filter migration, trauma to adjacent structures.Filter tilt has been reported.Potential causes may include filter placement in ivcs with diameters larger than those specified in these instructions for use; improper deployment; manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter); and (or) a failed retrieval attempt.Excessive filter tilt may contribute to difficult or failed retrieval; vena cava wall penetration/perforation; and (or) result in loss of filter efficiency.Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: unacceptable filter tilt.10 devices in lot.No relevant notes on work order.The product is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, or that any cook device caused or contributed to or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|