• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number PCB00
Medical Device Problem Code Inaccurate Delivery (2339)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Patient info: unknown, information not provided.Date of event: unknown, not provided, but the best estimate date is during 2021.If implanted, give date: not applicable, as there is no indication that the lens was implanted if explanted, give date: not applicable, as there is no indication that the lens was implanted therefore it was not explanted.Attempts have been made to obtain missing information; however, to date, no response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a pcb00 model intraocular lens(iol) misfired while physician was using it.There was no harm to the patient.No further information available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section d9: device available for evaluation: yes section d9: returned to manufacturer on: 9/28/2021 section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes device evaluation: the product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.Visual inspection under magnification revealed that the lens was returned damaged (bent), stuck inside the cartridge tip with a plunger rod override.There was no assembly issue identified (before and after disassembly), the device plunger was in advance position and locked.The cartridge and cartridge tip were observed to be damaged which may be caused by the pushrod due extra force in the loading lens process.Furthermore, trace amount of viscoelastic residues were observed inside the cartridge which suggests an inadequate amount of ovd was used during the loading and insertion process.The complaint issue could not be confirmed and no product deficiency could be identified.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing records for the intraocular lens were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.The search revealed no other complaints from this production order number has been received.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
1700 e st andrew place
santa ana, CA 92705
7142478552
MDR Report Key12349511
Report Number2020664-2021-07127
Device Sequence Number17245032
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474558175
UDI-Public(01)05050474558175(17)230128
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNC
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 12/14/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/28/2023
Device Model NumberPCB00
Device Catalogue NumberPCB0000155
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/28/2021
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/25/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer11/22/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/20/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/14/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/28/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-