Occupation: other, senior counsel, litigation.Please note that the exact event date is unknown.It was reported that a patient underwent placement of an unknown vena cava filter.The information provided indicated that the filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused filter fracture and perforation.The patient reported becoming aware of the events approximately eighteen years and seven months post implant.The patient also reported water retention.The indication for the filter placement and pertinent medical records have not been provided.There is currently no additional information available for review.The product was not returned for analysis and the sterile lot number has not been provided; therefore, no device analysis nor device history record review could be performed.An inferior vena cava filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pulmonary embolism where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pulmonary embolism where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.The instructions for use (ifu) states that filter fracture is a potential complication of vena cava filters.Anatomic locations that create concentrated stress points from filter deformation (for example, deployment at apex of scoliosis, overlapping of either of the renal ostia, or placement adjacent to a vertebral osteophyte) may contribute to fracture of a particular filter strut.The ifu notes vessel damage such as intimal tears and perforation as a long-term and procedural complication related to ivc filters.Without images available for review the reported events could not be confirmed or further clarified.Water retention also known as edema, is swelling that is trapped in the body tissue, this does not represent a device malfunction and may be related to underlying patient specific issues.Given the limited information currently available for review, there is nothing to suggest that the reported events are related to the design and manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.Please note that this is the initial report for this product.
|
As reported by the legal brief, the patient underwent placement of an unspecified cordis vena cava filter.The report states that the filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury and damage to the patient including, but not limited to filter fracture and perforation.As a direct and proximate result of these malfunctions, the patient suffered life-threatening injuries and damages, and required extensive medical care and treatment.As a further proximate result, the patient has suffered and will continue to suffer significant medical expenses, pain and suffering, and other damages.Information received per the patient profile form (ppf) states that the patient experienced filter fracture within the inferior vena cava (ivc) and perforation of filter struts outside the inferior vena cava (ivc).The patient became aware of the reported events approximately eighteen years and seven months after the index procedure.The patient reported that she continues to experience water retention.
|