|
|
| Model Number |
SMXP100RUH |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Deformity/ Disfigurement (2360)
|
| Date of Event |
08/03/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: the expander was not retaining fluid.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a (b)(6) year-old caucasian female patient underwent a primary breast augmentation with a 350cc artoura breast tissue expander prosthesis and experienced postoperative right-sided deflation.A healthcare professional stated that the patient¿s tissue expander was not retaining fluid.As a result, the patient underwent removal and replacement with a 350cc artoura breast tissue expander prosthesis ( right catalog #: smxp100ruh, right serial #: (b)(4)) on (b)(6) 2021.Upon explantation, the right-sided device was observed to be deflated, and the diagnosis was confirmed by her surgeon.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On (b)(6) 2021, the suspected medical device was returned for evaluation.On (b)(6) 2021, the investigation on the suspected medical device was completed.Investigation summary: the product was returned to mentor for evaluation.Mentor conducted a visual inspection and leak testing of the returned device.During visual analysis of the returned device, no apparent damage or visual anomalies were observed.Leak testing was performed, in accordance with mentor procedures, and no leak sites were detected during the analysis.The event described could not be confirmed as the tissue expander was returned without detectable damage.Although no product defect was identified, there may have been other circumstances or issues that occurred during the use of the device that could not be replicated during the laboratory analysis.As part of mentor¿s quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Manufacturer's reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|