|
Additional information: patient weight and ethnicity and race: unknown as information was not provided.Date implanted: not applicable, as the iol was removed/replaced during the same procedure.Date explanted: not applicable, as the iol was removed/replaced during the same procedure.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
|
Additional information was received, and the following fields were updated accordingly: section d-9: device available for evaluation: yes section d-9: date returned to manufacturer: 27-aug-2021 section h-3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification revealed viscoelastic residue on the optic body and haptics and that the lens had been cut into three pieces, which is consistent with a lens handled during removal and replacement.Both haptics were also observed to be detached (one missing).Furthermore, a portion of the remaining haptic was observed to be damaged (bent).Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation could be performed.The complaint issue can be confirmed; however, based on the return condition of the lens this cannot be confirmed to be related to manufacturing, and therefore no product deficiency could be identified.Manufacturing records review: the manufacturing records for the product were reviewed, the product was manufactured and released according to specification.Historical data analysis: a search revealed that no other complaints have been received for this production order (po) number.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation, there is no indication of a product malfunction or product quality deficiency.The reported issue was not verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|