|
This is the first occurrence of this event reported in the history of the device.No other similar events have been reported.Review of design validation activities indicate that the taper connection between the tibial tray and tibial stem passed all cyclic fatigue and axial disassembly testing required by the fda as documented in test report 101-09911-015.Review of the device history records indicate that devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.The inspection gages for both sides of the taper connection were calibrated and certified on 10/30/2020.Devices from the same lot in question were sent to a third party to re-inspect the taper.The devices were inspected and all were found to be within specification.The explanted device was returned for evaluation.A visual inspection did not present any defects in the material.Due to unremovable debris, we were not able to dimensionally inspect the specific devices in question; however, the tibial stem was installed into the tibial baseplate using the recommended method.The minimum pullout strength for static disassembly was verified using force gauge e009 as specified in the taper connection strength test report.Due to this overwhelming amount of evidence, manufacturer has ruled out the presence of a manufacturing defect and maintains that the device did not malfunction or fail meet performance specifications for its intended use.The reporting healthcare professionals have confirmed that the tibial stem was not properly installed into the tibial baseplate and that the implanted tibial baseplate was undersized to the patient.The manufacturer has concluded that this is an isolated event with the primary cause traced to a single user, where misuse of the device contributed to patient injury.If additional information is received, it will be provided in a supplemental report.Timely reporting: this report is being submit beyond the 30-day window due to technical issues in verifying our webtrader test account.This delay was unforeseen and not indicative of our investigation.Manufacturer had reports complete and ready in esubmitter, however should have initiated setup of webtrader account earlier than 7/28.The first test submission was sent out 7/30, but we did not receive production approval until 8/24.First the manufacturer fei number was missing from the test environment, then there was an issue receiving the acknowledgement receipt from cdrh.
|
|
User reported event of tibial stem disassociation from a tibial baseplate.The user is a healthcare professional who determined that the patients were, "obese and sustained catastrophic settling/fracture of the bone underneath the base plate which is what i attribute to the dislodgement of the tibial stem from the baseplate".This injury required revision surgery to restore osseointegration.User report suggests that the "base plate was hugely undersized and malpositioned".This event occurred concurrently in one additional patient where the implants were installed (29 days apart) by the same surgeon (who is not the reporting user).Additional communication on (b)(6) 2021 confirmed that, "[installing surgeon] confirms by radiographic examination that he has grossly undersized [patient]." in the initial communication the user indicated their, "suspicion is that our operating team did not impact the stem sufficiently to the tibial tray and when there was catastrophic settling forces caused the stem to disengage".Additional communication on (b)(6) 2021 confirmed that just prior to the event, "surgeons had transitioned to allowing the surgical techs to impact the stem.The techs were taught to impact the stem hard however when i demonstrated to them how hard you had to hit the stem, all of them confirmed that they did not impact the stem into the tibial base plate as demonstrated.".
|