|
Manufacturing and quality control data the progav® 2.0 shunt system was manufactured by a qualified employee in february 2014.Deviations during assembly did not occur.The system was sterilized by miethke and released for shipment after final inspection.For the purposes of this investigation, the progav® 2.0 shunt system is comprised of a progav® 2.0 adjustable pressure valve with a normal pressure range of 0 to 20 cmh2o and a shuntassistant® fixed pressure valve with a fixed pressure range of 25.The shunt system was inspected as article f435t.All parameters have been inspected and approved during the manufacturing process.All parameters have been assessed as meeting specifications visual inspection: tissue residues on the returned product, but no visible obvious damages.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that both valves are permeable.Computer controlled test: to investigate the claim of over/under-drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valves are tested in both the horizontal as well as the vertical positions.The results show that the valves operates within the accepted tolerance in both positions.Adjustment test: the progav® 2.0 was tested and is adjustable to all specified pressures.Braking/klick force and brake function test: the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function is fully operational and the braking force is within the given tolerances.Internal inspection: after dismantling of the valves, minimal deposits were found in both valves.Results: it should be noted that the product was received dry (i.E.Not submersed in liquid as recommended).The investigation of dry items is not significant due to the affect dry deposits of liquor and blood can have on product performance.In spite of this, we have investigated the valve to the best of our abilities.Based on our investigation, we are unable to substantiate the clinical claim of occlusion.At the time of our investigation, the valves were shown to be permeable.However, it is possible that the deposits observed inside the valve could have caused the malfunction in the past.As described in scientific literature, the problem encountered is one of the known, inevitable risks of hc-therapy by shunt implants.Deposits caused by natural substances in the cerebrospinal fluid, such as protein, blood or tissue particles, are among the known and unavoidable risks and side effects of hydrocephalus therapy.Small amounts of non-visible deposits/proteins might compromise the integrity of the valve.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The shunt system met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
|
|
It was reported that a progav 2.0 shuntsystem was implanted during a procedure performed on an unknown date.According to the complainant, the shunt system was believed to be operating in overdrainage and was difficult to adjust.The patient underwent a revision procedure on (b)(6), 2021.The complaint device was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.No patient complications were reported as a result of the revision procedure.Age: (b)(6).Weight: (b)(6).Height: 168 centimeters (cm).Gender: male.
|