|
Model Number SFR-6-30 |
Device Problem
Break (1069)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 08/26/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Medtronic received a report that the distal part of the solitaire pushwire broke/separated.The patient was undergoing treatment for an occlusion located in the m1 segment of the right middle cerebral artery.The patient's baseline mrs, nihss, and tici scores were 4, 13, and 2a respectively.Post procedure these were 0, 7, and 2b respectively.The patient's vessel tortuosity was normal.The stroke onset to reperfusion time was 220 minutes.It was reported that the microcatheter was in place and the stent was deployed.After the stent was pulled back into the microcatheter, the proximal end of the stent was broken.The pushwire had not been torqued during the procedure, and no resistance was encountered.One pass had been made with the device.All the broken segments were removed the patient.The device was replaced, and the patient did not experience any injury or complications.The devices were prepared according to the instructions for use (ifu).
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information received reported that the patient had vessel stenosis proximal to the thrombus site.The microcatheter tip covered the solitaire device proximal marker during the attempted retrieval.The characteristics of the clot were said to be "proper".
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product analysis: as found condition (condition of returned device): the solitaire fr revascularization device was returned for analysis within a shipping box and within a sealed biohazard-pouch.Visual inspection/damage location details: no bends or kinks were found with the solitaire pushwire.The marker coil was found to be intact.The pushwire was found to be broken 0.835mm from distal end of marker coil.The solitaire fr stent was not returned.No other anomalies were observed.Testing/analysis (including sem reports): the solitaire fr broken pushwire was sent out for sem (scanning electron microscopy) analysis for failure analysis of the broken end.Per the sem analysis report, the wire end was covered up by contaminants.The wire morphology suggests a ductile overload type failure.No other anomalies were observed.Conclusion: based on the device analysis and reported information, the customer¿s report of ¿pushwire break/separation¿ was confirmed as the pushwire was found to be broken.The investigation determined that this event was similar to an event that had already been investigated, and another investigation is not necessary.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|