It was reported that, after a previous tha revision surgery had been done on an unspecified date, the patient kept experiencing pain.A revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2021 to replace the polarstem and the oxinium femoral head; the other components are from other brands.Another oxinium femoral head and a redapt stem and sleeve were implanted.Current status of patient's health is unknown.
|
H3, h6: the device, used in treatment, was not returned for evaluation and the reported event could not be confirmed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, although clinical/ medical records were not provided, it was reported the revision was done, ¿due to subsidence of the stem following kicking a football on (b)(6) that caused a fracture.¿ it cannot be concluded the revision was associated with a malperformance of the implant or implant failure.The patient impact beyond the revision and post-op convalescence period cannot be determined.No further clinical assessment is warranted at this time.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Possible causes could include but not limited to traumatic injury, joint tightness, material in use, patient reaction or loss of sterility.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.
|