• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV 2.0 SYS SA2.0 25 A.PED.PRECHAMBER; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV 2.0 SYS SA2.0 25 A.PED.PRECHAMBER; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FX597T
Medical Device Problem Code Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Hydrocephalus (3272)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation: visual inspection: yellowish signs on the catheter, but no significant deformations or damage of the valve were detected during the visual inspection.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that the valve is permeable.Computer controlled test: to investigate the claim of under-drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The results show that the valve is operating not within the accepted tolerance in the vertical position.Internal inspection : after dismantling of the valve, no deposits were found in shuntassistant 2.0.Results: based on our examination results, we can detect an accelerated outflow at the valve at the time of our investigation.Despite the lack of significant deposits, it is possible that even non-visible or small amounts of build-up could have led to a temporary compromise of the valve and to the observed malfunction in the past.As described in scientific literature, the problem encountered is one of the known, inevitable risks of hc-therapy by shunt implants.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The valve met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a shuntassistant 2.0 (part # fx597t) was implanted during a procedure performed on an unknown date.According to the complainant, the shunt system was believed to be operating in underdrainage.The patient underwent a revision procedure on (b)(6) 2021.Only the shuntassistant 2.0 was removed.No malfunction of the valve was suspected by the physician; the surgeon believed that the gravitational unit was not tolerated because the patient has had a differential pressure unit for whole life.The patient underwent a revision procedure on (b)(6) 2021 and the shuntassistant 2.0 was removed.The complaint device was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.No patient complications were reported as a result of the revision procedure.Age: (b)(6), height: unknown, weight: unknown, gender: female.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROGAV 2.0 SYS SA2.0 25 A.PED.PRECHAMBER
Common Device Name
HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM  14469
MDR Report Key12388713
Report Number3004721439-2021-00250
Device Sequence Number4724114
Product Code JXG
UDI-Device Identifier04041906503543
UDI-Public4041906503543
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K190174
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Explanted Year2021
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative,foreig
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 08/30/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/14/2025
Device Model NumberFX597T
Device Catalogue NumberFX597T
Device Lot Number20047376
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/23/2021
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/23/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/30/2021
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age27 YR
-
-