| Model Number |
ZXT300 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Visual Impairment (2138); Visual Disturbances (2140); Halo (2227)
|
| Date of Event |
07/19/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Weight, and ethnicity: information unknown/not provided.If explanted; give date: n/a (not applicable).The lens remains implanted.The intraocular lens (iol) is not returning for evaluation as it remains implanted; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts have been made to obtain missing information; however, no definitive response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that at the 6 month unmasked study visit, the patient's visual acuity is uncorrected distance visual acuity (ucdva) 20/25 od (right eye), 20/30 os (left eye) and best corrected distance visual acuity (bcdva) 20/20 ou (both eyes) with the intraocular lens (iol).The patient is very bothered by halos while driving at night, extremely bothered by multiple/double vision while driving and seeing clearly at distance, and extremely bothered by glare while driving after dark.There are no plans for surgical intervention.Month 1 ((b)(6) 2021) visual acuity: ucdva 20/25 ou; bcdva 20/20 od, 20/25 os.Preoperative ((b)(6) 2021) visual acuity: ucdva 20/50 od, 20/60 os; bcdva 20/25 od, 20/30 os.Patient had bilateral lens implants.This report captures the lens implanted in patients right eye.A separate report will be filed for the left eye.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional info: further information was provided and reported the subject is still driving, but they limit where they drive at night to the areas they are most familiar.Even with the reported visual issues, the subject continues to drive.Prior to the implant of the iol, the subject noted they were moderately bothered while driving at night.No other information was provided.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional info: additional information received that the lens has been explanted.The surgery was completed successfully with a non-johnson & johnson replacement lens.No complications during surgery.The following sections have been updated accordingly: section b2: outcomes attributed to adverse event: required intervention to prevent permanent impairment/damage (devices) section d6b: if explanted; give date: (b)(6).2021 section h6: health effect - impact code- 4629- explant device evaluation: the device was not returned at the manufacturing site; therefore, product testing could not be performed and the customer¿s reported complaint could not be verified.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing records for the intraocular lens were reviewed.The product was manufactured according to specifications.A search of complaints revealed 1 other complaint has been received for this production order number and the issue could not be confirmed.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be confirmed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional info: additional information received pertaining to patient outcome.The subject denies glare and halos since the explant occurred.Subject reports they are "extremely happy with their visual acuity (va) after surgery" (explant).Subjects best corrected visual acuity (bcva) was 20/40 ou.Section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: 1/6/2022.Device evaluation: the complaint lens was received inside a specimen cup.Visual inspection under magnification revealed viscoelastic residue on the optic body and haptics and that the lens was received cut into three pieces, which is consistent with a lens handled during explant.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation could be performed.Therefore, no product deficiency could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|