• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 VENTRIO MESH; SURGICAL MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 VENTRIO MESH; SURGICAL MESH Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 0010212
Medical Device Problem Codes Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Pain (1994); Insufficient Information (4580)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol ventrio mesh (device #2).Additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol ventrio mesh (device #1).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for the implant of two unspecified bard/davol ventrio patches on (b)(6) 2014 and (b)(6) 2016.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress, sustained personal injury and the device was defective.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for the implant of two unspecified bard/davol ventrio patches on (b)(6) 2014 and (b)(6) 2016.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress, sustained personal injury and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2014 - patient was diagnosed with incarcerated symptomatic incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of ventrio hernia patch (device #1).Per op notes, "a ventrio hernia patch (device #1) was placed into the abdominal wall using prolene sutures." (b)(6) 2016 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent left flank incisional hernia, chronic left flank pain thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with the implant of ventrio hernia patch (device# 2).Per op notes, "found the previously placed mesh (device #1).A ventrio hernia patch (device #2) was placed intra-abdominally.".
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol ventrio mesh (device #2).Additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol ventrio mesh (device #1).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-apr-2014) is considered to be a best estimate.This supplemental emdr represents the bard/davol¿ ventrio mesh (device #2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol - ventrio mesh (device #1) note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VENTRIO MESH
Common Device Name
SURGICAL MESH
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643
100 crossings blvd.
warwick RI 02886
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED 3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
andrew topoulos
100 crossings blvd.
warwick, RI 02886
4018258495
MDR Report Key12445067
Report Number1213643-2021-07481
Device Sequence Number16999406
Product Code FTL
UDI-Device Identifier00801741016394
UDI-Public(01)00801741016394(17)170428(10)HUYD1252
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTX
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K100229
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2016
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 07/20/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/28/2017
Device Catalogue Number0010212
Device Lot NumberHUYD1252
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/05/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/02/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/09/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date07/20/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured04/15/2014
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-