• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION REZUM; UNIT, ELECTROSURGICAL ENDOSCOPIC (WITH OR WITHOUT ACCESSORIES)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION REZUM; UNIT, ELECTROSURGICAL ENDOSCOPIC (WITH OR WITHOUT ACCESSORIES) Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Micturition Urgency (1871); Unspecified Infection (1930); Pain (1994); Urinary Retention (2119); Discomfort (2330); Erectile Dysfunction (4511)
Event Date 02/01/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Date of event: the exact event date of starting symptom from index procedure is unknown.Investigation summary: based on the information available, there was no device available for analysis and there was no report of a device performance allegation during treatment.The reported patient symptoms are known risks associated with water vapor therapy procedures and are noted as such in the device instructions for use.Device history record (dhr): a dhr and ship history review cannot be performed as the lot number was not available.Device technical analysis: the device is not available for analysis; therefore, no physical or visual analysis of the product could be performed.Labeling review: the device instructions for use (ifu) was reviewed.The patient symptoms of discomfort, pain, urinary retention, infection, impotence and urinary urgency were found to be listed in the ifu.Investigation conclusion: based on the information available, a conclusion code of known inherent risk of device was assigned to this investigation.
 
Event Description
It was reported a patient underwent a water vapor therapy procedure of the prostate.During the procedure the patient reported to have experienced discomfort even with the recommended local sedation.After the water vapor therapy treatment, a catheter was placed.The urine bag filled to a full liter immediately after the patient stood up.The medical staff emptied the bag and there was no concern about this response to the treatment until the following few weeks.A week after the treatment, the physician removed the catheter and did a void test.The patient could not void and described the void attempt as very painful.The physician put the catheter back in and sent the patient home for another week.After a week, the catheter was then removed, and the patient was sent home.The patient experienced difficulty voiding and urinating without pain.The patient went to the emergency room (er) and another catheter was inserted.Two weeks later, the catheter was removed and the patient was sent home again.The same symptoms of difficulty voiding and urinating with severe pain occurred again.The patient went to the er for a second time where they provided him with another catheter which the patient had for 6 weeks.The patient is about 3 months post-treatment and still has a catheter.In addition, the patient has an infection which is suspected to be from the catheter, and is still unable to urinate without pain.The patient gets up several times a night with the urge to urinate, and is experiencing erectile dysfunction.The patient is now on cialis daily (dose unknown) and stated that he never had a problem with erections prior to receiving the treatment.The patient has seen his doctor several times about current condition and urinary concerns, but he has not yet discussed solutions or plans to address his sexual function concerns.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
B3 date of event: the exact event date of starting symptom from index procedure is unknown investigation summary: based on the information available, there was no device available for analysis and there was no report of a device performance allegation during treatment.The reported patient symptoms are known risks associated with water vapor therapy procedures and are noted as such in the device instructions for use.Device history record (dhr): a dhr and ship history review cannot be performed as the lot number was not available.Device technical analysis: the device is not available for analysis; therefore, no physical or visual analysis of the product could be performed.Labeling review: the device instructions for use (ifu) was reviewed.The patient symptoms of discomfort, pain, urinary retention, infection, impotence and urinary urgency were found to be listed in the ifu.Investigation conclusion: based on the information available, a conclusion code of known inherent risk of device was assigned to this investigation.
 
Event Description
It was reported a patient underwent a water vapor therapy procedure of the prostate.During the procedure the patient reported to have experienced discomfort even with the recommended local sedation.After the water vapor therapy treatment, a catheter was placed.The urine bag filled to a full liter immediately after the patient stood up.The medical staff emptied the bag and there was no concern about this response to the treatment until the following few weeks.A week after the treatment, the physician removed the catheter and did a void test.The patient could not void and described the void attempt as very painful.The physician put the catheter back in and sent the patient home for another week.After a week, the catheter was then removed, and the patient was sent home.The patient experienced difficulty voiding and urinating without pain.The patient went to the emergency room (er) and another catheter was inserted.Two weeks later, the catheter was removed and the patient was sent home again.The same symptoms of difficulty voiding and urinating with severe pain occurred again.The patient went to the er for a second time where they provided him with another catheter which the patient had for 6 weeks.The patient is about 3 months post-treatment and still has a catheter.In addition, the patient has an infection which is suspected to be from the catheter, and is still unable to urinate without pain.The patient gets up several times a night with the urge to urinate, and is experiencing erectile dysfunction.The patient is now on cialis daily (dose unknown) and stated that he never had a problem with erections prior to receiving the treatment.The patient has seen his doctor several times about current condition and urinary concerns, but he has not yet discussed solutions or plans to address his sexual function concerns.It was further reported that the symptoms have persisted and the patient has experienced bladder infections from his bladder retaining urine.The patient recently received an antibiotic injection due to recurring infections.Another foley catheter will be placed.The prescribed cialis has not improved the impotence issues.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
REZUM
Type of Device
UNIT, ELECTROSURGICAL ENDOSCOPIC (WITH OR WITHOUT ACCESSORIES)
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer Contact
alyson harris
4100 hamline avenue north
building c
saint paul, MN 55112
4089353452
MDR Report Key12447692
MDR Text Key270573615
Report Number2124215-2021-27289
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KNS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/12/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/09/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/02/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Other;
Patient Age55 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-