|
Zimmer biomet complaint (b)(4).A summary investigation has been completed for peri-implantitis events recognizing that a definitive root cause cannot be identified due to a wide range of external factors (non-design or manufacturing related), including medical conditions (e.G., diabetes, poor bone quality, etc.) / patient habits (e.G., smoking) and surgical technique.Previously completed investigations for these events have not identified any signals indicating potential non-conformances affecting the manufacturing and sterilization processes.Furthermore, the probability of a manufacturing or design defect that might lead to peri-implantitis occurring and escaping the available detections has been assessed and found remote and almost nonexistent.Should additional information be received which indicates that the device may have caused or contributed to the event, an additional report will be submitted.
|
|
It was reported that the implant was placed by guided placement at tooth site # 8 on (b)(6) 2021.Used bone regenerative material (ossix volumax) as facial bone just at 2 mm thick.Abscess first noted on (b)(6) 2021 and antibiotics prescribed.Tried lapip procedure at exposure, patient was to travel, decided to remove implant.Performed socket regeneration at removal.The implant was removed due to being mobile and peri implantitis.Abscess and infection are symptoms of the event.
|