|
The reported event was confirmed supplier related.1 sample was confirmed to exhibit the reported failure.The device had not met specifications.The product was used for treatment.The product had caused the reported failure.Visual evaluation of the returned sample noted one opened (without original packaging), used dome bag.Visual inspection noted the inlet tubing was kinked.The dome bag was attempted to fill with methylene blue solution (3 drops 1% aq methylene blue per 100ml distilled water), and solution was not able to enter the bag.Upon further inspection, there was a clear piece of pvc material present in between the inlet tubing and dome port.Verified dome cavity c2.This is out of specification which states, "there shall be no occlusion of the i.D.Of the inlet port, verify with pin gage".Additionally, it is possible the kinked tubing contributed to the restricted flowrate.This is out of specification which states, "any kinks in drainage tube, which reduce the i.D.More than 25% are not permitted." a potential root cause for this failure could be inspection results (measurement, testing data) not verified by iqa assignee and incorrect assembly operation of clamp/rubber band.The dhr review could not be performed without a lot number.Therefore, no additional action is required at this time.The device was returned for evaluation.The lot number is unknown; therefore, the device history record could not be reviewed.A labeling review was not performed because labeling could not have prevented the reported failure.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : the actual/suspected device was inspected.
|