| Model Number |
L971110 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Osseointegration Problem (3003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pain (1994); Inadequate Osseointegration (2646)
|
| Date of Event |
08/26/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint #(b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Revision due to aseptic loosening.Patient experienced pain.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
1.Can you confirm the primary surgery date or the original implantation date? (b)(6) 2010.2.Can you please provide the date the patient was revised? (b)(6) 2021.3.What is the affected side involved in this event? right.4.Please provide the loosening interface of the loose stem.Bone / implant.5.Please provide the product and lot number of all explanted products.Na.6.Was there any suggestion by anyone indicating that there was or may be deficiency with the other product(s)? if yes please ensure details.No.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary : no device associated with this report was received for examination.A worldwide lot specific complaint database search, or device history record (dhr) review, was not possible because the required lot number was not provided.Based on previous investigations, this complication of joint replacement is unlikely to have been the result of a device failing to meet required specifications.The information received will be retained for potential series investigations if triggered by trend analysis, post market surveillance, or other events within the quality system.Device history lot : a worldwide lot specific complaint database search, or device history record (dhr) review, was not possible because the required lot number was not provided.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|