• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC US TRI-LOCK BPS SZ 3 STD OFFSET; TRILOCK HIP STEM : HIP FEMORAL STEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC US TRI-LOCK BPS SZ 3 STD OFFSET; TRILOCK HIP STEM : HIP FEMORAL STEM Back to Search Results
Model Number 1012-04-030
Medical Device Problem Codes Fracture (1260); Osseointegration Problem (3003)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Pain (1994); Ambulation or Postural Difficulties (2544); Inadequate Osseointegration (2646)
Date of Event 08/27/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2013, the patient underwent the tha surgery.In the surgery, our company¿s stem and head, stlyker¿s cup and liner were used.Around 2017, the surgeon had a suspect of loosening of the stem but was watching how it went.The patient had no subjective symptoms.Until 2020, the postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient had been enjoying ballroom dancing.Since 2020, the patient's adl has decreased.On (b)(6) 2021, loosening of the stem was confirmed.The patient has pain and has difficulty in walking.On (b)(6) revision surgery was performed.In the surgery, implanted products were removed.When the removed stem was checked, peeling of coating was confirmed.Because the stem was completely loose, no chisel etc.Were used during removal.Doi: (b)(6)2013, dor: (b)(6) 2021, unknown side.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # : (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary no device associated with this report was received for examination.All available x-rays and photographs were reviewed, and implant loosening and peeling of the coating was found.Depuy synthes considers the investigation closed at this time.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed, and the investigation may be re-opened as necessary.Device history lot the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.B3 as per reported in the initial mw.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary : examination of the returned device confirmed the reported event.Visual examination of the provided x-ray images also found evidence of subsidence.Depuy considers the investigation closed.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation will be re-opened as necessary.Device history lot : no deviations or anomalies were noted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRI-LOCK BPS SZ 3 STD OFFSET
Common Device Name
TRILOCK HIP STEM : HIP FEMORAL STEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC US
700 orthopaedic drive
warsaw IN 46581 0988
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. 1818910
700 orthopaedic dr.
warsaw IN 46581 0988
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
700 orthopaedic dr.
warsaw, IN 46581-0988
6107428552
MDR Report Key12487223
Report Number1818910-2021-20361
Device Sequence Number19670573
Product Code KWA
UDI-Device Identifier10603295000747
UDI-Public10603295000747
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
P070026
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2013
Device Explanted Year2021
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/31/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number1012-04-030
Device Catalogue Number101204030
Device Lot Number326705
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/13/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/31/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/11/2021
10/25/2021
10/13/2021
11/09/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/17/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/11/2021
10/26/2021
10/29/2021
11/15/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/10/2013
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
ARTICUL/EZE BALL 32 +5 BR
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age77 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight62 KG
-
-