| Model Number |
ASC4251-01 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
08/24/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during use in an arthroscopy, the tip electrode of the starvac 90 icw got broken.All the broken pieces were removed from the patient.The procedure was successfully completed without delay using a smith and nephew back up device.No patient injury or other complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during use in an arthroscopy, the tip electrode of the starvac 90 icw got broken.All the broken pieces were removed from the patient.The procedure was successfully completed without delay using a smith and nephew back up device.No further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H10 h3, h6: the reported device, used in treatment, was received for evaluation.There was a relationship found between the returned device and the reported incident.A visual inspection of the returned instrument shows no manufacturing abnormalities.There is one metal ball detached from the electrode, the screen portion under the ball is intact.Product was out of the original packaging.No packaging returned.The device was plugged into the controller and registered settings (1,7).The wand was able to generate plasma as intended a review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A clinical review states per case details, the broken electrode was removed from the patient.The procedure was completed using a back-up device.No patient injuries or adverse consequences were reported.Since no patient injuries are being reported no further clinical/medical assessment is warranted at this time.The complaint was confirmed and the root cause was associated with unintended use of the device.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include: (1) hitting the device tip against a hard surface.(2) using the device as a lever to enlarge surgical site.(3) mechanical displacement of tissue through applied force.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|