|
This complaint was reopened in reference to (b)(4).Investigation: the valve was received submersed in an unidentified liquid in the provided returnkit.Visual inspection: no significant deformations or damage of the valve were detected during the visual inspection.The valve housing was subsequently measured and indicated the presence of a deformation.The measured valve was slightly out of tolerance.Result: first, we performed a visual inspection of the progav.No significant deformations or damage of the valve were detected during the visual inspection.But a deformation was detected through a measurement of the plan parallelity.Next, we tested the permeability, adjustability,as well as the brake functionality and brake force.The valve was reduced permeable but could not be adjusted to all settings.The brake function operates as expected.However, the breaking force required was not within the given specifications.Finally, we have dismantled the valve.Inside the valve we have found a build-up of substances (likely protein).Based on our investigation, the valve was shown to be reduced permeable.We are assuming that the deposits detected within the valve have caused the functional impairment.Deposits caused by natural substances in the cerebrospinal fluid, such as protein, blood or tissue particles, are among the known and unavoidable risks and side effects of hydrocephalus therapy.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The valve met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke (b)(4).No further actions required.
|