• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WILLIAM COOK EUROPE GUNTHER TULIP NAVALIGN JUGULAR VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WILLIAM COOK EUROPE GUNTHER TULIP NAVALIGN JUGULAR VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number IGTCFS-65-1-JUG-TULIP
Device Problems Inadequate Filtration Process (2308); Obstruction of Flow (2423); Structural Problem (2506); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problems Pulmonary Embolism (1498); Internal Organ Perforation (1987); Perforation of Vessels (2135); Anxiety (2328); Depression (2361); Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Occupation: non-healthcare professional.Investigation: it has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information and/or no device failure provided to date.Catalog number and lot number are unknown, however, the alleged tulip is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.
 
Event Description
It is alleged that the patient received a gunther tulip inferior vena cava (ivc) filter on (b)(6) 2012, and the patient was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested, but not yet provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
G4: (510k): k172557.Investigation: investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The following allegations have been investigated: pulmonary embolism, organ/vena cava perforation, blood clot in lungs, anxiety, depression.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.The following allegations have been investigated: pulmonary embolism, organ/vena cava perforation, blood clot in lungs, anxiety, depression.New pe as a reported complication, is a known risk in relation to filter implant and is well documented in the clinical literature and in clinical practice guidelines.This is supported by the clinical evidence report established to assess available clinical data to identify and evaluate the clinical safety and performance of the cook vena cava filters.Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: pulmonary embolism.Filter interacts with ivc wall, e.G.Penetration/perforation/embedment.This may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include improper deployment; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in-situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: trauma to adjacent structures, vascular trauma, vena cava perforation, vena cava penetration.Ivc occlusion/ thrombosis, new dvt, ivc stenosis as a reported complication, is a known risk in relation to filter implant and is well documented in the clinical literature and in clinical practice guidelines.This is supported by the clinical evidence report established to assess available clinical data to identify and evaluate the clinical safety and performance of the cook vena cava filters.Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: vena cava occlusion or thrombosis, vena cava stenosis, deep vein thrombosis.Unknown if the reported anxiety and depression are directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.20 devices in lot.No relevant notes on wo for neither device (igtcfs-65-1-jug-tulip) lot: e2883903, nor filter (igtf-30) lot: e2878117 and e2878099.2 other complaints on lots ((b)(4), (b)(4) ¿ not related to this issue).Product is manufactured and inspected according to specification.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event Description
Patient allegedly received an implant on (b)(6) 2012 via the right internal jugular vein due to deep vein thrombosis (dvt).Patient is alleging organ and vena cava perforation.Patient is alleging anxiety.1 pulmonary emboli, depression, blood clots in lungs.Per x ray report, "patent inferior vena cava mid and proximal segments and hepatic veins.Distal inferior vena cava is seen inferior vena cava filter, unable to visualize inferior vena cava distally." per computed tomography report, "ivc filter in place appropriately positioned inferior to the renal veins, about 1.5 cm below the right renal vein and 2.5 cm below the left renal vein entry.Appropriate alignment of the filter with no significant tilt.No evidence of the filter fracture or deformity.All 4 inferior tips of the filter project 5-1 o mm outside the confines of the ivg with that at 2 o'clock contacting wall of abdominal aorta at 10 o'clock.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GUNTHER TULIP NAVALIGN JUGULAR VENA CAVA FILTER SET
Type of Device
DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
WILLIAM COOK EUROPE
sandet 6, dk-4632
bjaeverskov
Manufacturer (Section G)
WILLIAM COOK EUROPE
sandet 6, dk-4632
bjaeverskov
Manufacturer Contact
lissi walmann
sandet 6, dk-4632
bjaeverskov 
56868686
MDR Report Key12513560
MDR Text Key272742353
Report Number3002808486-2021-01802
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/10/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/02/2015
Device Catalogue NumberIGTCFS-65-1-JUG-TULIP
Device Lot NumberE2883903
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/25/2021
Initial Date FDA Received09/22/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/22/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/10/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/01/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight95 KG
-
-