|
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. HEALICOIL KNOTLESS RG ST; FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
72205136 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Crack (1135)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
09/01/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during an arthroscopy procedure, after the internal plug was descended, the larger/distal knob was turned to insert the healicoil regenesorb suture anchor into the bone.After a few turns, the anchor did not descend any further and the bottom part of the anchor cracked.The anchor cracked due to the distal tip not being fully seated before descending the anchor into the bone.It was removed successfully.The procedure was completed without delay using an s+n back-up device.No other complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
B4: information added.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during an arthroscopy procedure, after the internal plug was descended, the larger/distal knob was turned to insert the healicoil regenesorb suture anchor into the bone.After a few turns, the anchor did not descend any further and the bottom part of the anchor cracked.The anchor cracked due to the distal tip not being fully seated before descending the anchor into the bone.It was removed successfully.The procedure was completed without delay using an s+n back-up device in the originally drilled bone hole.No other complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H6: the reported device was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation, thus visual inspection and functional testing could not be performed.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A review of the material specifications found there are requirements for conformance and a certificate of material analysis is required per the complaint details, we are currently unable to rule out a procedural variance as the likely cause of the reported event, which does not represent a device malfunction.Based on the information provided, the anchor cracked due to the distal tip not being fully seated before descending the anchor into the bone.It is unknown if the healicoil¿ knotless regenesorb¿ suture anchor, instructions for use was adhered to.The ifu warns: it is the responsibility of the surgeon to determine the patient¿s bone condition, appropriately prepare the insertion site, and determine the suitability of the implant for the procedure.According to the report, the broken piece was removed successfully, and the procedure was completed through the original bone hole without delay using an s+n back-up device.Since no other complications were reported, no further clinical/medical assessment is warranted at this time.There was no way to determine if the device contributed to the reported event.The complaint was not confirmed.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future reoccurrence of the reported event.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this investigation will be reopened for evaluation.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|