• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. SENSAR IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. SENSAR IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number AR40E
Medical Device Problem Codes Material Fragmentation (1261); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
Date of Event 08/17/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Weight and ethnicity: unknown, information not provided.Initial reporter telephone number: (b)(6).(b)(4).The device is not returning for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the patient had lens model ar40 implanted in the sulcus due to zonular instability.Because the patient had pre-existing zonular instability, a 3 piece lens was chosen instead of a 1 piece lens.The follow-up examination revealed that the intraocular lens (iol) was displaced.The lens was explanted.During the explant it was found that the haptic of the iol was torn off.Patient was implanted with an artisan / verisyse iol as the replacement lens.No further information provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9 - device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9 - date returned to manufacturer: 09 december 2021.Section h3 - device evaluated by manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: product evaluation was performed under magnification.The complaint lens was received coated in viscoelastic residue.After cleaning it was shown that a haptic was detached.The complaint of haptic detachment could be confirmed but the complaint of instability after implantation could not.The complaint of haptic detachment could not be confirmed to be related to manufacturing as it is possible the haptic detachment occurred during handling while being explanted.Therefore, no product deficiency could be identified.Manufacturing record evaluation: the manufacturing records for the intraocular lens were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.A search revealed that no additional/similar (as applicable) complaints for this order number have been received.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation, there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SENSAR IOL
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
1700 e st andrew place
santa ana, CA 92705
7142478552
MDR Report Key12517038
Report Number2020664-2021-07432
Device Sequence Number4032125
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474502215
UDI-Public(01)05050474502215(17)260407
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2021
Device Explanted Year2021
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/21/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Expiration Date04/07/2026
Device Model NumberAR40E
Device Catalogue NumberAR40E00255
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/09/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/26/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/13/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/22/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/21/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/07/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age72 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-