• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV SYS W/SA 20 A.CONTROL RESERVOIR; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV SYS W/SA 20 A.CONTROL RESERVOIR; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FV434T
Medical Device Problem Code Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Hydrocephalus (3272)
Date of Event 11/04/2016
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This complaint was reopened in reference to (b)(4).Investigation: visual inspection: scratches on the outer housing of the progav¿ were observed through the visual inspection.No significant deformations or damage were detected.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that the progav¿ is permeable.Adjustment test: the progav was tested and is not adjustable throughout the normal range.Braking force and brake function test: the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function is operational, however the breaking force cannot be measured due to the non-adjustability of the valve.Results: first, we performed a visual inspection of the progav¿.Scratches on the outer housing of the valve were observed through the visual inspection.No significant deformations or damage were detected.Next, we tested the permeability, adjustability, as well as the brake functionality and brake force.The valve was permeable but could not be adjusted to all settings.Finally, we have dismantled the valve.Inside the valve we have found a build-up of substances (likely protein).Based on our investigation, we confirm that the progav¿ was non-adjustable at the time of our investigation.This is likely due to the deposits observed inside the valves.Deposits caused by natural substances in the cerebrospinal fluid, such as protein, blood or tissue particles, are among the known and unavoidable risks and side effects of hydrocephalus therapy.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The valve met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke (b)(4).No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a progav sys w/sa 20 a.Control reservoir.(#fv434t) was implanted during a procedure performed on unknown date.According to the complainant, the valve was believed to be not adjustable.The patient underwent a revision procedure on (b)(6) 2016.The complainant device was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.Further details were not provided.Patient information: age: (b)(6).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROGAV SYS W/SA 20 A.CONTROL RESERVOIR
Common Device Name
HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM  14469
MDR Report Key12519836
Report Number3004721439-2021-00665
Device Sequence Number5174591
Product Code JXG
UDI-Device Identifier04041906132460
UDI-Public4041906132460
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K103003
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Explanted Year2016
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative,user f
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 09/23/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/31/2019
Device Model NumberFV434T
Device Catalogue NumberFV434T
Device Lot Number20025781
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/21/2016
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/23/2016
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/23/2021
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age2 YR
-
-