• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIU375
Medical Device Problem Code Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Corneal Edema (1791); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
Date of Event 06/14/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Weight, ethnicity: unknown, not provided.(b)(4).Device evaluation: product evaluation was not performed because the product has not been returned.The complaint issue reported could not be verified and no product deficiency could be identified.Manufacturing records review: the manufacturing records for the product were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specifications.Historical data analysis: a search of complaints revealed no other complaints have been received for this production order number.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation, there is no indication of a quality product deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a tecnis eyhance intraocular lens (iol) was explanted from the patient's left eye because the surgeon believes the lens power is not correct.It was indicated that the symptoms were noticed immediately following the surgery ((b)(6) 2021) and that at one week, the patient still had corneal edema.The surgeon also reported that the patient has resting tremor and floppy iris.The replacement lens used was a diu300, 25 diopter.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section d9.Device available for evaluation? yes.Returned to manufacturer on: 11/4/2021.Section h3.Device evaluated by manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification revealed viscoelastic residue on the optic body and haptics and that the lens was received cut in half and a haptic detached, which is consistent with a lens that was handled during explant.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation could be performed.The complaint issue could not be confirmed, and no product deficiency could be identified.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
1700 e st andrew place
santa ana, CA 92705
7142478552
MDR Report Key12524026
Report Number2020664-2021-07483
Device Sequence Number5169281
Product Code MJP
UDI-Device Identifier05050474748460
UDI-Public(01)05050474748460(17)240311
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateWA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2021
Device Explanted Year2021
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 12/07/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/11/2024
Device Model NumberDIU375
Device Catalogue NumberDIU375U275
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/04/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/30/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer11/17/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/23/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/07/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/11/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age62 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-