|
|
| Model Number |
J492G |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Integrity Problem (2978)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Eye Injury (1845); Blurred Vision (2137)
|
| Date of Event |
08/24/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number qmmelc/j492g50 and no non-conformance's related to the reported complaint condition were identified.Attempts are being made to receive a device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at the later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent attempts are being made to receive additional information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Please provide the patient's demographic information including age, gender, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure date and name of index surgical procedure? the diagnosis and indication for the index surgical procedure? were any concomitant procedures performed? on what tissue was the suture used? what was the tissue condition (normal, thin, calcified, fragile, diseased)? how was the suture placed (interrupted or continuous)? please describe any medical/surgical intervention required for this suture event including dates and results.Did the operating surgeon observe any suture deficiency or anomaly before, during, after the suture placement or during any re-operation? other relevant patient comorbidities/concomitant medications? what is the physician¿s opinion as to the etiology of or contributing factors to this event? what is the patient's current status? are any actual or unopened samples available for return? if yes, please provide a shipping date and tracking information.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient underwent an unknown surgery on unknown date and the suture was used under eyelid.Around a month after surgery, the patient came back feeling some foreign material under the eyelid and experiencing blurred eyesight.It was found that the cornea was damaged due to the presence of suture material.The surgeon opined that the absorption of suture was slower than usual.Additional information has been requested.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Date sent to the fda: 10/22/2021.Attempts are being made to clarify the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.How was the damaged cornea treated? please describe.What is the current patient's status? additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: date and name of index surgical procedure? - (b)(6) 2021.Please describe any medical/surgical intervention required for this suture event including dates and results.- suture removal on (b)(6) 2021.Are any actual or unopened samples available for return? if yes, please provide a shipping date and tracking information.- no.The following information was requested, but unavailable: please provide the patient's demographic information including age, gender, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure.The diagnosis and indication for the index surgical procedure? were any concomitant procedures performed? on what tissue was the suture used? what was the tissue condition (normal, thin, calcified, fragile, diseased)? how was the suture placed (interrupted or continuous)? did the operating surgeon observe any suture deficiency or anomaly before, during, after the suture placement or during any re-operation? other relevant patient comorbidities/concomitant medications? what is the physician¿s opinion as to the etiology of or contributing factors to this event? what is the patient's current status? this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate date sent to the fda: 10/22/2021.Corrected information: b3.Corrected h 6.Health effect - impact codes: f19.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint #(b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate investigation summary: the product was returned to ethicon inc for evaluation.Visual inspection evaluation was conducted on the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample determined that an unopened sample of product code j492g was received to ethicon inc for evaluation, the samples were examined for visual defects: appearance , color package, wrinkles in the seal area, continuous seals , seal margins, over-sealing, damage (torn, punctured).The packet was opened, and the swage and attachment area was noted to be as expected.During the visual inspection, the sutures were correctly placed on the paper folder.The suture was dispensed without problems and examined along the strand and no defects, damage on the suture surface could be observed.As part of our quality process, the manufacturing records of this lot-serial number were reviewed, and the manufacturing standards were met prior to the release of this batch.Complaint information will be included in the complaint trending that is reviewed on a regular basis to determine if further action is necessary.Additional information was requested and the following was obtained: how was the damaged cornea treated? please describe.[ans: the customer just told the sales rep.That suture removal was done on the date mentioned previously.] what is the current patient's status? [ans: there is no further outstanding follow up with the customer].
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|