As reported by implant patient registry, post operative day (pod) 1 of a 23mm sapien 3 valve in a pre-existing pulmonic conduit the valve in the pulmonic position, the s3 valve was explanted due to st changes caused by compression of one of the branches feeding the lad, which was later found to be coming off the right coronary cusp.Post deployment, the team struggled to get good images of the left coronary system due to the double pre-stents with the sapien 3 valve inside.The proximal left coronary system was difficult to visualize, and the ekg showed st changes.The patient was hemodynamically stable, however, the decision was made to move to the floor and monitor the patient and troponin levels.One of the branches feeding the lad was later found to be coming off the right coronary cusp, which the team believes must have been compressed causing the st changes.Over night, the troponin levels continued to elevate.The decision was made to bring the patient to the operating room and remove the pre-stent and sapien 3 valve then sew in a surgical valve.This was performed and the patient left the operating room in stable condition.
|
Per the instructions for use (ifu), coronary flow obstruction is a potential adverse event associated with the tpvr procedure.The ifu cautions that assessment for coronary compression risk prior to valve implantation is essential to prevent the risk of severe patient harm.Coronary occlusion can result in myocardial ischemia or infarction due to obstruction of the coronary blood flow and may require intervention (e.G.Pci).There are multiple patient factors that could contribute to coronary occlusion including a minimal distance between the transcatheter heart valve (thv) landing zone and the coronary artery.The edwards thv training manuals advise the operator on pre-procedure assessment of the pulmonic thv target implantation site, aortic valve, root, and coronary anatomy.Physicians are extensively trained by edwards before they are qualified to use the thv.Training includes patient screening, device preparation, approach, deployment, imaging, procedure-specific training manuals and proctored procedures.The physician is instructed to evaluate this risk early in the patient screening process in all patients.In this case, the cause of the coronary artery compression cannot be confirmed.However, there was no allegation or indication a device malfunction contributed to this adverse event.Per report, it was difficult to get good images of the left coronary system for coronary compression assessment due to the patient having double pre-stents in the landing zone.The ifu and training manuals have been reviewed and no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.No corrective or preventative actions are required.
|