• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ENDOLOGIX AFX; BIFURCATED STENT GRAFT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ENDOLOGIX AFX; BIFURCATED STENT GRAFT Back to Search Results
Model Number BA25-90/I16-30
Medical Device Problem Code Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Failure of Implant (1924)
Date of Event 09/01/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device involved in this event will not be returned for evaluation as it remains implanted in the patient.Patient medical records and imaging studies will be requested for further evaluation by the clinical specialist.If additional information pertinent to the incident is obtained, a follow-up report will be submitted.Device iteration is afx with duraply.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient was initially implanted with a bifurcated stent graft and an infrarenal aortic extension to treat an abdominal aortic aneurysm (aaa).It was reported that at some point after the initial procedure, a type 2 endoleak (non-device related failure) was identified and the lumbar artery was embolized with a coils.Approximately five (5) years post initial procedure, an angiogram showed a suspect type 3a endoleak.The patient is currently being monitored while an intervention is being discussed.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient was initially implanted with a bifurcated stent graft and an infrarenal aortic extension to treat an abdominal aortic aneurysm (aaa).It was reported that at some point after the initial procedure, a type 2 endoleak (non- device related failure) was identified and the lumbar artery was embolized with a coils.Approximately five (5) years post initial procedure, an angiogram showed a suspect type 3a endoleak.The patient is currently being monitored while an intervention is being discussed.Subsequent to the initial report, additional information was provided reporting that reintervention was performed with implant of a gore excluder (non-endologix) successfully sealing the suspect type 3a endoleak.The patient was reported to be doing well.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The reported adverse event/incident was investigated in alignment with endologix operating procedures and work instructions.Where possible, it is endologix practice to make at least three good faith efforts to retrieve a reported adverse event/incident related device as well as medical records and medical imaging.An evaluation of the manufacturing record was completed.A review of the part number/lot number combination needed for device identification shows the device to have been properly manufactured and released in accordance with the device master record.The review confirms there were no manufacturing or processing non-conformities identified that would contribute to the reported adverse event/incident.There are no other equivalent adverse events/incidents for this lot number existing within the endologix complaint handling system.An evaluation of the device could not be completed.The device was not returned to endologix for evaluation because it remains implanted.A clinical evaluation of the adverse event/incident could not be completed.No medical records nor medical imaging relevant to the reported adverse event/incident was received by endologix.The user facility was unable to provide this information.Due to the absence of medical records and medical imaging; device, use, procedure, and/or anatomy relatedness to this adverse event/incident could not be evaluated.The final patient status was reported to be pending reintervention.No additional investigation of this reported adverse event/incident is planned.However, should additional information relevant to the investigation outcome become available, a follow-up report will be submitted.Endologix will continue to monitor this and similar adverse events/incidents.Device iteration is afx with duraply.B2: outcomes attributed to adverse events - updated.B5: describe event or problem - updated.G4: awareness date - updated.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The reported adverse event/incident was investigated in alignment with endologix operating procedures and work instructions.Where possible, it is endologix practice to make at least three good faith efforts to retrieve a reported adverse event/incident related device as well as medical records and medical imaging.An evaluation of the manufacturing record was completed.A review of the part number/lot number combination needed for device identification shows the device to have been properly manufactured and released in accordance with the device master record.The review confirms there were no manufacturing or processing non-conformities identified that would contribute to the reported adverse event/incident.There are no other equivalent adverse events/incidents for this lot number existing within the endologix complaint handling system.An evaluation of the device could not be completed.The device was not returned to endologix for evaluation because it remains implanted.A clinical evaluation of the adverse event/incident could not be completed.No medical records nor medical imaging relevant to the reported adverse event/incident was received by endologix.The user facility was unable to provide this information.Due to the absence of medical records and medical imaging; device, use, procedure, and/or anatomy relatedness to this adverse event/incident could not be evaluated.The final patient status was reported to be pending reintervention.No additional investigation of this reported adverse event/incident is planned.However, should additional information relevant to the investigation outcome become available, a follow-up report will be submitted.Endologix will continue to monitor this and similar adverse events/incidents.Device iteration is afx with duraply.H6: result code: remove code 3233.H6: conclusion code: remove code 11.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AFX
Common Device Name
BIFURCATED STENT GRAFT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ENDOLOGIX
2 musick
irvine CA 92618
MDR Report Key12527136
Report Number2031527-2021-00411
Device Sequence Number14742378
Product Code MIH
UDI-Device Identifier00818009010230
UDI-Public(01)00818009010230(17)190405
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
P040002
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2016
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source foreign,health professional,o
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Remedial Action Other,Recall
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 09/06/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/05/2019
Device Model NumberBA25-90/I16-30
Device Lot Number1414171007
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/06/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer09/06/2021
10/14/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/24/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/07/2021
10/22/2021
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
If action reported to FDA under 21 USC 360i(g), list
FDA-assigned Recall Number or include a statement
Z-0006-2019
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
INFRARENAL AORTIC EXTENSION, LOT # 1379606016; INFRARENAL AORTIC EXTENSION, LOT # 1379606016
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age81 YR
-
-