SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. REDAPT SLVD MONO STEM 300MM SZ 22 HO; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER, NON-POROUS, CALICU
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 71354865 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Inflammation (1932); Inadequate Osseointegration (2646)
|
Event Date 07/11/2018 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that 8 months after medically indicated revision of left total hip performed on (b)(6) 2018 where redapt slvd mono stem 300mm sz 22 ho was implanted, the patient underwent another revision surgery with hardware removal due to recalcitrant bursitis with prominent trochanteric cable plate.It is unknown what devices were explanted from the patient.2 years after the surgery, the patient still reported some pain in the left leg with trochanteric nonunion.Additional details about primary surgery are unknown.Patient outcome is unknown.This de-identified clinical data is related to a post market clinical follow-up activity for redapt sleeved mono stems.As the data collection activity has been done retrospectively and data is provided anonymized, the information provided is limited and further information cannot be obtained.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H3, h6: the device, used in treatment, was not returned for evaluation and the reported event could not be confirmed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, per case details, the patient underwent another revision surgery with ¿hardware removal due to recalcitrant bursitis with prominent trochanteric cable plate.¿ it is unknown which devices were explanted.¿two years after surgery patient reports left leg pain with trochanteric nonunion.¿ it has been reported that no additional information is available.No further patient specific clinically relevant information was provided for evaluation.Without clinically relevant information for evaluation, the root cause of the reported events cannot be definitively concluded.Further patient impact beyond the reported symptoms and revision could not be assessed.No further medical assessment could be rendered at this time.A review of the complaint history for the listed part revealed no prior complaints for the listed failure mode.A review of the risk management file and instructions for use documents revealed this failure mode was previously identified.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Possible causes could include but are not limited to traumatic injury, abnormal loading of the limb, alignment or surgical technique.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.Additional information: d3.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|