• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. R3 0 DEG XLPE ACET LNR 36MM X 54MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. R3 0 DEG XLPE ACET LNR 36MM X 54MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED Back to Search Results
Model Number 71332754
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Unspecified Infection (1930)
Date of Event 11/06/2019
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Internal reference number: (b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, after thr surgery had been performed on (b)(6) 2019, the patient experienced an infection.This adverse event led to a revision surgery, performed on (b)(6) 2019, in which a oxonium fem hd 12/14 36 mm -3 and a r3 0 deg xlpe acet lnr 36 mm x 54 mm were replaced and debridement was conducted.Additionally, the patient received antibiotic therapy to control the infection.The current health status of patient is unknown.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6: the device, used in treatment, was not returned for evaluation and the reported event could not be confirmed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, per case details, the patient experienced an infection requiring debridement, antibiotics and a revision less than 2 months after a thr.The patient current health status is unknown.The infection was treated with antibiotics.Reportedly the root cause of the revision was infection, however the source of the infection remains unknown.No further clinically relevant information was provided for evaluation.Without clinically relevant information for evaluation, the root cause of the reported events cannot be definitively concluded.Further patient impact beyond the reported revision, debridement, infection, and antibiotics, could not be assessed.No further medical assessment could be rendered at this time.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history did not reveal additional complaints for the listed batch.A review of the risk management file and instructions for use documents revealed this failure mode was previously identified.A review of the sterilization records revealed the batch was sterilized within normal parameters.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Possible causes could include but are not limited to contamination, patient reaction, and post-operative healing issue.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, after a tha surgery performed on (b)(6) 2019, due to the developed of periprosthetic joint infection of streptococcus agalactiae 2+, a revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2019 for an irrigation debridement and the extraction of the oxinium femoral head 12/14 taper 36 mm -3 and the r3 0 degree xlpe acetabular liner 36mm id x od 54mm.Additionally, the patient received antibiotic therapy to control the infection.This adverse event was resolved and patient is recovered, patient did not have any problem walking after the revision.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Internal reference number: (b)(4).Internal reference number: (b)(4).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6: the device was not returned for evaluation.The pictures provided were reviewed and could not confirm the stated failure mode.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, reportedly the root cause of the head and liner revision was the periprosthetic joint (streptococcus agalactiae) infection; however, the source of the infection could not be definitively concluded.Patient impact beyond the reported irrigation/debridement, infection, antibiotics, revision, and study discontinuation could not be assessed.No further medical assessment could be rendered at this time.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history revealed similar events for the listed device over the previous 12 months, but no similar events for the batch based on the historical data, this failure mode will be monitored for future complaints for any necessary corrective actions.A review of the risk management file and instructions for use documents revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Possible causes could include but are not limited to contamination, patient reaction, and post-operative healing issue.The contribution of the device to the reported event could not be corroborated.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
R3 0 DEG XLPE ACET LNR 36MM X 54MM
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key12530550
Report Number1020279-2021-07159
Device Sequence Number19704909
Product Code JDI
UDI-Device Identifier03596010597991
UDI-Public03596010597991
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K113848
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2019
Device Explanted Year2019
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/08/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number71332754
Device Catalogue Number71332754
Device Lot Number18BM21223
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/02/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer11/03/2021
11/03/2021
03/04/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/24/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/04/2021
11/19/2021
03/08/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured02/28/2018
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight68 KG
-
-