| Model Number |
ZXT150 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Headache (1880); Visual Disturbances (2140); Halo (2227)
|
| Date of Event |
06/28/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Weight, and ethnicity: unknown, not provided.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the surgeon removed the tecnis symfony intraocular lens (iol) from the patient's right (od) eye and replaced with an eyhance toric iol of the same diopter.The explant occurred due to patient first complained of having headaches on (b)(6) 2021 and later complained of distance vision not sharp enough.The patient stated that he did not like the halos and the low light conditions made him not feel safe when driving.No further information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device evaluation: product evaluation was not performed because the product has not been returned.The complaint issue reported could not be verified and no product deficiency could be identified.Manufacturing records review: the manufacturing records for the product were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specifications.Historical data analysis: a search of complaints revealed no other complaints have been received for this production order number.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation, there is no indication of a quality product deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section d9.Device available for evaluation? yes.Returned to manufacturer on: 10/5/2021.Section h3.Device evaluated by manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification revealed viscoelastic residue on the optic body and haptics and that the lens was received cut in half, which is consistent with a lens that was handled during explant.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation could be performed.The complaint issue could not be confirmed, and no product deficiency could be identified.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|