• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number ZCB00
Medical Device Problem Code Material Fragmentation (1261)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 08/30/2021
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Age or date of birth, weight and ethnicity: unknown, information not provided.Implant date: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.Explant date: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the intraocular lens (iol) was implanted into patient's operative eye; however, lens was removed during the same surgery due to a missing haptic.No further complications occurred and no other interventions were required.Another lens of same model was used as the replacement.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section d9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: oct 4, 2021 section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: the product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.Visual inspection under magnification revealed viscoelastic residue on the optic body and haptics, which is consistent with lens that was removed.The lens was cleaned, and a detached haptic was observed.Dimensional inspection was performed on the remaining haptic and measured within specifications.The complaint issue was confirmed; however, based on the fact that the lens was removed this may be attributed to handling during removal it cannot be confirmed to be related to manufacturing issue.Therefore, no product deficiency could be identified.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing records for the intraocular lens were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.The search revealed one additional investigation request (ir) for this production order number has been received, however, is not related to this complaint and no escalations were required.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
1700 e st andrew place
santa ana, CA 92705
7142478552
MDR Report Key12530599
Report Number2020664-2021-07516
Device Sequence Number14744798
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474531499
UDI-Public(01)05050474531499(17)220812
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMO
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 12/01/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/12/2022
Device Model NumberZCB00
Device Catalogue NumberZCB0000090
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/04/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/31/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer11/08/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/24/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/01/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/12/2018
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
-
-