It is likely that the fistula formed secondary to a surgical error in the initial procedure such as a small bowl perforation.This would lead to fistula formation, abscess, and gross inflammation accounting for the noted extensive adhesions.Given the short time frame between initial surgery and the events noted (approximately 1 month), it is highly unlikely that the device would have caused or contributed to these events.While it is unlikely that the device is the initiating cause of the abscess and fistula, its presence may have been a factor in the inflammatory response and subsequent removal.
|