|
Investigation results were made available.1.Event description: it was reported that patient underwent an initial total hip arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2021.Subsequently the patient suffered traumatic fall and periprosthetic fracture of the proximal femur.The patient underwent a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2021.Harm: s3 - bone fracture hazardous situation: patient's anatomy is exposed to excessive external forces postoperatively.2.Review of received data: no medical data relevant to the case has been received.It was reported that the patient fell and sustained a peri prosthetic fracture of the proximal femur.This was a traumatic peri prosthetic fracture.Due diligence: no further due diligence required as all required information to support the conclusion is available or was already requested.3.Product evaluation: no product was returned as it was discarded; therefore, visual and dimensional evaluation could not be performed.4.Review of product documentation: device purpose: this device is intended for treatment.Dhr review: review of the device history records identified no deviations or anomalies during manufacturing.No ncr with a potential correlation to the reported event was found.5.Conclusion: it was reported that patient underwent an initial total hip arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2021.Subsequently the patient suffered traumatic fall and periprosthetic fracture of the proximal femur.The patient underwent a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2021.Neither x-rays, operative notes, office visit notes, nor device(s) or photos of the device(s) were received; therefore the condition of the component(s) is unknown.Patient factors that may have affected the performance of the components such as bone quality, activity level, type of activity (low impact vs.High impact), and relevant medical history are unknown.Additionally it was reported that the patient fell and sustained a periprosthetic fracture of the proximal femur.This was a traumatic periprosthetic fracture.Based on the available information the reported event cannot be confirmed.The quality records show that all specified characteristics have met the specifications valid at the time of production.Therefore, the investigation did not identify a nonconformance or a complaint out of box (coob).Based on the given information and the results of the investigation, we were not able to confirm the reported bone fracture and were not able to identify a specific root cause for this.However, based on the reported information the most likely root cause for the reported event is the patient's fall and not related to the device.The need for corrective measures is not indicated and zimmer switzerland manufacturing gmbh considers this case as closed.Zimmer biomet's reference number of this file is (b)(4).
|