• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS AG TRIAL FEMORAL HEAD 36 XS/-3; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/POLYMER, CEMENTED OR NON-POROUS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS AG TRIAL FEMORAL HEAD 36 XS/-3; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/POLYMER, CEMENTED OR NON-POROUS Back to Search Results
Model Number 75100855
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Fracture (1260)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 09/13/2021
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that.After a procedure, the scrub tech noticed the trial femoral head 36 xs/-3 had a piece fall out of it.This happened after use in patient.One of the four tines on the inside of the trial head broke off.All pieces accounted for it did not cause a surgical delay.Patient was not injured as consequence of this problem.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6: it was reported that after a procedure, the tech noticed that the trial femoral head 36 xs/-3 had a piece fall out of it.This happened after use in the patient.The complaint device, used in treatment, was returned for investigation.The reported issue could be confirmed upon visual inspection.One of the four flaps is observed to be fractured.A review of the batch record revealed no deviations from the standard manufacturing process that could have contributed to the reported issue.A review of the complaint history revealed no additional complaint for the batch in question.A review of the risk management documentation verifies the failure mode and severity of the reported issue.Review of past corrective actions was performed.No further escalation is required.The performance of the device is within the risks that are anticipated in the risk management documentation of the product.Previous investigations demonstrated that the trial femoral head may disconnect from the stem taper intra-operatively and flaps might break off.In combination with our continuous effort to improve our products, evaluations aimed at optimizing this instrument have been initiated.The performance of the device is nonetheless within the risks, which are anticipated in the risk management documentation of the product, both in occurrence and severity.The continued performance of the device shall be monitored through standard post market surveillance review processes.The reported failure mode of a flap breakage can be confirmed, the root cause is attributed to a insufficient design specification.S+n will continue to monitor these devices for similar issues.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6: it was reported that after a procedure, the tech noticed that the trial femoral head 36 xs/-3 had a piece fall out of it.This happened after use in the patient.One of the four flaps on the inside of the trial head broke off.All pieces accounted for it did not cause a surgical delay.Patient was not injured as consequence of this problem.The device intended for use in treatment was not returned for investigation.An evaluation of the complained device could therefore not be conducted, and the reported failure mode could not independently be confirmed.A review of the complaint history revealed no additional complaint for the batch in question.A review of the batch record revealed no deviations from the standard manufacturing process that could have contributed to the reported issue.Based on available information, the reported failure mode could not be confirmed.A relationship between the reported event and the device cannot be confirmed.There is no indication that the reported device failed to meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.Due to insufficient information it is not possible to speculate about factors which could have contributed to the reported event.The root cause stays undetermined after investigation.The need for corrective action is not indicated.Nevertheless, smith + nephew will continue to monitor this device for similar issues.This complaint will be reopened should additional information or the device be received.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRIAL FEMORAL HEAD 36 XS/-3
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/POLYMER, CEMENTED OR NON-POROUS
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS AG
schachenallee 29
aarau CH-50 00
SZ  CH-5000
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS AG
schachenallee 29
aarau CH-50 00
SZ   CH-5000
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key12544214
Report Number9613369-2021-00373
Device Sequence Number4428254
Product Code LZO
UDI-Device Identifier07611996121889
UDI-Public07611996121889
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K132435
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 12/24/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number75100855
Device Catalogue Number75100855
Device Lot NumberA59038
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/09/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/13/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/25/2021
12/23/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/28/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/26/2021
12/24/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/20/2016
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-