|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the right internal carotid artery (ica) using a px slim delivery microcatheter (px slim), pac400 coil, pod400 coil and penumbra smart coils (smart coil).During the procedure, the physician placed a few pod400 and pac400 into the target location.While attempting to advance the px slim to cross a lesion second time, the proximal end of the px slim kinked.Consequently, the pac400 and pod400 would not deploy.Therefore, the px slim, pac400 and pod400 were removed.It was reported that the pod400 and pac400 did not have any issue.Next, the physician used a non-penumbra microcatheter and placed several smart coils in the target location; however, the subsequent smart coil would not advance past the friction lock within its introducer sheath.Therefore, the smart coil was removed.The procedure was completed using three non-penumbra coils, two more smart coils and the same microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|
|
Evaluation of the returned px slim revealed a fracture on the mid-shaft.This damage may be the reported kink on the proximal shaft, confirming the reported complaint.If the device is manipulated at extreme angles during use, damage such as a kink and subsequent fracture may occur.Further evaluation revealed ovalizations on the distal shaft.This damage was likely incidental to the reported complaint and the root cause could not be determined.Evaluation of the returned smart coil revealed that the pusher assembly mid-joint was retracted into the introducer sheath friction lock.This is likely the probable cause of the reported complaint.If the mid-joint is retracted into the friction lock, resistance may be experienced during advancement.Forceful advancement against this resistance likely contributed to the pusher assembly kinks near the mid-joint.The smart coil was unable to be advanced from its returned position within the introducer sheath during the functional test.Penumbra catheters and coils are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This report is associated with mfr report number: 1.3005168196-2021-02144.
|