|
The doctor noticed that the fixture mount was loose before the implant was placed.However, when the implant was placed in that condition, the slot part of the fixture mount and the tine part of the implant body ruptured.The doctor stopped using the implant and placed another implant.
|
|
This report is being submitted to relay additional information and device evaluation.The following sections are being reported: b4: date of this report was updated.G3: date received by manufacturer was updated.G6: type of report was updated.H2: type of follow up was updated.H3: device evaluated by manufacturer was updated.H6: tyoe of investigation code was added: 3331, 4109, 4110 and 4111 h6: investigation findings code was added: 213 h6: investigation conclusions codes were added: 4310 h10: narrative/data was updated.One impl twist mp-1 3.75 mm 8 mm (1988), mount and mount screw were returned for investigation.Visual evaluation of the as returned products identified debris around the screw threads and damage around the implant splines/platform possibly due to the removal/placement - damage observed on returned implants due to trephine removal is not considered a malfunction or failure of the device.Zimmer biomet is not responsible for any damage caused by the clinician's removal of the device.No rupture/fracture was identified with any of the devices.They were returned outside of the original packaging ¿ packaging was already opened.Therefore, the complaint could not be verified.The products were returned outside of the original packaging without evidence of malfunction that correlates with the complaint description.The complaint out of box (coob) failure could not be confirmed since the condition of the products as received by the customer was nonverifiable.Based on the evaluation, device malfunction has not occurred - the products were damaged during removal/placement which is not considered a device malfunction.Additionally, there is no existing nonconformance / capa / hhe/d / ie / product hold against the reported devices/packaging that did or could cause or contribute to the reported events.Monthly post market trending review identified no actionable trends or corrective actions for the reported event or devices.Zimmer biomet quality management system (qms) has controls in place to ensure the distribution of conforming products.However, based on the available information, the condition of the products as received by the customer could not be determined.Dhr review for the lot (2020060164) had revealed no deviations nor non-conformances which could have caused or contributed to the reported event.All products were conforming at the time they left zimmer biomet.Lot was inspected and passed all acceptance criteria by qa.The dhr was further reviewed to verify the packaging process.No malfunction or nonconformance was identified.Complaint history review was performed for the reported lot number (2020060164) for similar events (complaint category keyword: fracture) and no other complaint was identified.Functional testing to recreate the reported event could not be performed due to the nature of the devices and events.Therefore, the reported event could not be recreated.A definitive root cause could not be determined.Based on the investigation and risk file review, the most likely cause to the reported event is mishandling of product outside of zimmer biomet controls - product not placed properly.No further investigation or immediate capa / hhe/d escalation is required, as the complaint investigation did not confirm the products were nonconforming at the time of distribution, and no new failure mode, harm, or hazardous situation was identified through the investigation performed.
|